Forum archives » Regarding Stripcreator » One more catagory to the ratings

BobRogers
August 20, 2005 10:01 AM

Today I read a comic that cracked me up so badly I damn near wet myself. When I looked below to the ratings, the word "good" just seemed inadequate to reward that stripper for giving such a robust tee-hee.

What if there were another choice beyond merely "good?" Something on the order of "side-splitting" or "Outstanding" (for those marines among us) or maybe just "F***ing Awesome" to better express just how timely and giggleific a particular toon actually is.

On the flip side of that notion, does anyone else think that "bad" sometimes fails to describe some of the steaming dung that attempts to pass for humor?

In that regard, perhaps a 1 to a hundred scale, with "1" being "Donkey Ejaculate" and 100 being so perfect that Jesus is laughing.

In consideration of all that one other thought occurs and that is to leave everything exactly as it is and reject my ideas as being the droolings of a self important and pompus ass!

Just food for thought.

Post #185635link

mandingo
August 20, 2005 12:51 PM

quote:
Today I read a comic that cracked me up so badly I damn near wet myself.
you are welcome

i'd like the ratings to have a wider range too, but not too much since a shorter ranger makes the toprated list more volatile which makes it more fun to watch imo

i think 1-5 by ones would be perfect. 95% of comics i find funny i would rate 4, and that special breed that kills me would get the rare 5

Post #185638link

Splunge
August 28, 2005 9:32 PM

Problem being, how do we then post-rate older comics that have already been rated? All the previous ratings would have to be thrown out to be fair. A database nightmare.

Post #186348link

Forum archives » Regarding Stripcreator » One more catagory to the ratings

stripcreator
Make a comic
Forums
featuring
diesel sweeties
jerkcity
exploding dog
goats
ko fight club
penny arcade
chopping block
also
Brad Sucks