Okay, I've had some fun submitting some funny resolutions to the UN, but the fact of the matter is that most other regions seem to take the game pretty seriously. So my resolution for Mutually Assured Destruction (below) only has 12 supporters (it needs 111 more to come to a general vote). Partly this is because it was pointed out that it was "illegal." That is, it violates part of Resolution 109 which allows nations to do what they want about nuclear weapons.
Our best tactic is to come up with something, post it for debate in their forums (so one of the nuts who is really into this can point out if we are violating some other resolution, because I'm not reading all those freaking things) and then submit it when it has been suitably revised.
Now, like you, I don't take this too seriously, so my goal is to do something that reflects the personality of SC. Something that we think that could pass (or at least not get deleted so it can come to a general vote) but that is just ridiculous enough that you know we're tweaking them. Mutually Assured Destruction was my first attempt at this approach, but it wasn't quite subtle enough. Or, I might have gotten it through if I had put it in the forum and found out I needed to add a line that makes it repeal resolution 109.
I've posted this here one as an example, but since it is probably dead in the water (unless we care to resubmit a modified version) I am open to suggestions for a new one. Let's see those famous SC creative juices flow. Just wipe them up when you're done.
The United Nations,
OBSERVING that petty disputes between nations often result in conflict in which conventional weapons are used;
DISMAYED at the wanton and senseless death and destruction caused by such conflicts;
CONVINCED that no nation will dare attack another that is armed with nuclear weapons;
REQUIRES that every member nation construct or purchase nuclear missiles sufficient for the assured destruction of all neighboring nations.
