|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| I have a big problem with your skepticism. Leaving aside noumena for the moment, can't we use the innate categories in our minds to get a priori knowledge? | |
 | |  |
|
 |
| | |
| First, you have to understand that my skepticism was "mitigated." Aside from that, how can we really know anything with the mind? Isn't the phenomenal self only able to know phenomena? | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Perhaps you're right, but I just don't see why the two worlds can't participate in each other somehow. We ought at least to be able to know noumena by implication, right? | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| Can you hear yourself? You claim that you want to explore the limits of reason and confine yourself to those limits, but you can't shake this unjustified attachment to rationalism. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Eh, what I really wanted to know was how that orgy went. | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| Those women were totally worth having to see Jean-Jacques naked. | |
| | |
|
|
|
