|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| In FAIR v Rumsfeld, the Chief wrote for a unanimous court that congress can withhold funding for law schools that ban bigoted recruiters. | |
 | |  |
|
 |
| | |
| It's the right result, and was expected, but there is some text that might narrow what the First Amendment means about expressive conduct and association. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
* see www.stripcreator.com/comics/alcoac14
|
|
|
|
| | |
| The government cannot insist the schools go along with prejudice, but the goverment doesn't have to fund PC-ness. | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| A victory for the politically uncorrect*? | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Once again, "fair" is code for ivory tower outoftouchness | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| While "Rumsfeld" is code for assorted asshattery. | |
| | |
|
|
|
