|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| I think some people misunderstand my doubts about religion. It's just that, like Einstien and Sagan, I profess "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". | |
 | |  |
|
 |
| | |
| That's circumstantially odd considering that Einstein's Theories are not entirely proven factual. In fact, there is a growing body of evidence that suggest otherwise. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Still the statement rings wise and true. Without evidence, there is no basis to believe any work of conjecture. | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| Actually, I would counter that evidence is purely subject to perception. If I show evidence contrary to accepted factual findings, I am in contention till I am found correct. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Hmmm, I think I am starting to see that you have a point. But, of course, I will have to suspend judgement till I have had time to test this idea and submit it to brisk scrutinization. | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| Perhaps the statement should be "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary scientific appeal in order to gain immediate acceptance"? | |
| | |
|
|
|
