|
The interactionist got a lot of support in the 70s Becker, Lemert and Geoffman were they main founders and were uncahllenged in their definition of deviance! and explanation!
|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| Im right everythin i say is right cos its the reign of the INERACTIONISTS! | |
 | |  |
|
 |
| | |
| hes gotta point theres no other ideas. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
They were however eventually criticised and the defintion of daviance was challenged!
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Im right everythin i say is right cos its the reign of the INERACTIONISTS! | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| AH nah mate, we're here to criticise you. my names Taylor my buddies, Walton and Young and what is deviant is deviant. Soz. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
now there a lot more variations and interpretations of the word deviant since the interactionists were criticised!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| You see, deviance is our reaction to a crime or explicit action, not the other way around. | |
| | |
|
|
|
