|
BEFORE - no national curriculum, less female teachers meant less role models for girls.
|
|
|
|
 |
 | |  |
| Boys are more capable than girls, im glad there are no girls in my class | |
 | |  |
|
|
|
|
AFTER - The National Curriculum was introduced in 1988, meaning girls and boys could do the same subjects.GIST (girls into science and technology) and WISE (women into science and engineering)
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Nooo girls can take boys subjects ahhhh | |
| | |
|
 |
| | |
| i'm here to talk about being a female scientist. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
Alsion kelly (1987)........ Jo Boaler(1998)
|
|
|
|
| | |
| making science part of the compulsory curriculum helps to equalise opportunities and create peace. | |
| | |
|
 |
| | |
| schooling has become more meritocratic, this means that girls that genreally work harder than boys achieve more. | |
| | |
|
|
|
