Forum archives » Fights Go Here » The P(ASS)ion of the Christ

« Prev Page 1 of 5 Next »

MikeyG
February 27, 2004 12:13 PM

This is definitely becoming an issue in the world, and I can just see a lot of people having strong opinions on it.

Personally, I think Mel Gibson has his head up his ass. Anyone watching VH1 at all lately must have seen the joke that blonde girl said about how Mel Gibson has finally lost it, and by 'it' she means 'The Memo where it says Jews run Hollywood'. That's some funny shit. It may not be completely true, but a lot of Jewish people are prominent filmmakers, etc. in Hollywood.

I've listened to the shit his father has said. It's pure garbage. He denies that even 6,000 Jews were killed in the Holocaust. He said it was impossible because they were all in the Bronx and Queens. What? Since when can the Bronx or Queens hold six million anything? I don't seem to remember learning in history class about the Great Diaspora to Queens. Gibson defends his father, saying he(Dad) taught him(Mel) all his beliefs. RD said Mel was going to have to go on the record saying the Holocaust DID happen. Mel said, yes, it happened, a lot of people died, some of them were Jewish. WRONG!!!

MOST of them, at least, would have been a better statement. And although I tend to ignore critics about a movie until I've seen it, I have heard this movie portrays Jews in such a blatantly negative way that it is apalling. It is also rumored to be a two-hour Jesus beat-down, far, far more violent than necessary.

The worst thing about this? Not only are people FLOCKING to see this movie, but fanatical Christians are weeping and praying and causing huge uproars all over the place. Add in all the fucking merchandising that has already started (anyone see the Passion of the Christ race car?), and you've got one of the most evil films of this century.

But should the movie be allowed? Yup. Freedom of Speech means even shit like this has the right to be shown. I had just hoped people had better taste than to support such garbage.

Post #125938link

andydougan
February 27, 2004 12:32 PM

Good old Mikey, giving such fair criticism of a film he hasn't seen.

I believe more than half of holocaust victims were gentiles. Mel's dad sounds pretty wack though.

Post #125940link

MikeyG
February 27, 2004 12:35 PM

Maybe, dougan, but I'm not liking what I've downloaded so far.

Post #125941link

laughinginyourface
February 27, 2004 12:40 PM

I half agree with MikeyG.

Agreeing side: It's just a fucking movie. You don't need litanies over this. And evil is kind of how this might be described. What I mean by that is that it's taking over part of the world (the intangible world, mostly).

Disagreeing side: It is a movie, but some movie emotionally effect people. You might wanna see what other people's opinions are on it. I, myself, am Christian (probably not the best), but nevertheless I still intend on seeing it. Even if it isn't bibically correct, it probably still will make an impression on people. I can see it being a best seller.

Also, this is starting to sound like the Titanic movie.

Post #125942link

xxausrottenxx
February 27, 2004 12:48 PM

wait, so jesus dies in the end right?

Post #125943link

MaKK_BeNN
February 27, 2004 12:51 PM

The only time I think you can argue against a movie being released is if it's very violent and obviously marketed towards children, or will in some way cause riots or uprisings. If you're not doing harm and you're not forcing obscenity where it's not wanted or expected, you are allowed to artistically express whatever you want.

Other than that, you are a moron if you argue against someone's right to use their free speech. If Jesus offends you, don't watch the movie. If you are complaining about it you are just brainwashed by the criticism in the media, and you might as well have had your brains blown out with a hollow-tipped bullet.

Please note MikeyG complained about it BEFORE he saw the movie. Wow, way to form your own opinion, totally not influenced by the mass media, you gibbering, rotted-brain howler ape.

I don't see any anti-semitism in the release of the movie. I do see a lot of anti-Christianity though. Could you imagine if Christians were protesting the release of a movie made about Moses?

And MikeyG are you saying Mel Gibson shouldn't have made a movie about Jesus because there are Jews in Hollywood?

Wow, I'm really flabergasted by your stupidity. I really didn't think you were THAT stupid.

Post #125945link

User #16352
February 27, 2004 1:01 PM

quote:
wait, so jesus dies in the end right?
Agh! You ruined the ending for me!
You did the same thing to me with The Sixth Sense!

Post #125946link

MikeyG
February 27, 2004 1:09 PM

ha! Hey, MaKK, remind me to make an Excel spreadsheet outlining your comments nearly everywhere else. Anyway, what I should have said was, 'HYPOTHETICALLY', if what is being said is TRUE, then that is how I feel. Nevertheless, I am pretty disgusted with the merchandising of the story.

MaKK, thanks for once again adding absolutely nothing to what might have been a dialogue. You must have failed your SATs (If you're American), because your reading comprehension SUCKS.

Post #125949link

kaufman
February 27, 2004 1:27 PM

quote:
Also, this is starting to sound like the Titanic movie.
Your wish is my command!

214308214309214310214311

Post #125951link

User #16352
February 27, 2004 1:30 PM

213892

Post #125952link

MikeyG
February 27, 2004 1:33 PM

Ha ha ha ha ha!!! Funny.

Post #125953link

andydougan
February 27, 2004 2:05 PM

I heard that some woman died of a heart attack while watching the end of the film! I've already booked my ticket!

Post #125957link

User #16352
February 27, 2004 2:12 PM

214328

Post #125959link

graykane
February 27, 2004 2:48 PM

i saw the movie on wednesday night, and cinematically it was a piece of crap. all of the "story" happens offscreen in the audience's memory of the Bible. the only thing that happens onscreen was mel gibbson beating the fuck out of jesus for two hours. with the exception of pontius pilate (and maybe jesus, but even that's iffy since his range of emotions was suffering suffering suffering and apathy), the acting was nothing to write home about. in fact, the aramaic made each actor have trouble delivering more than three words at a time without weird unnatural pauses. the cinematography wasn't worth a red cent, especially in the opening woods scene. the sinead o'connor devil character was more of a distraction than anything (i would have enjoyed the film so much more if she weren't in it). in sum, as a film, the passion blows donkey dick.

and yet, if there's a believer somewhere inside you, then you'll cry, because mel gibbson beats the living crap out of jesus for two hours-- yes, a worse beating than mel got at the end of braveheart. i think he could have exchanged jesus for george bush, and i would have cried more (and probably would have gone to church this sunday to get down on my knees and thank God).

george w bush for jesus in 04.

Post #125967link

User #16352
February 27, 2004 2:57 PM

214344

Post #125969link

MaKK_BeNN
February 27, 2004 3:47 PM

quote:
i think he could have exchanged jesus for george bush, and i would have cried more (and probably would have gone to church this sunday to get down on my knees and thank God).

A true liberal wishes their political enemies could be beaten into silence and submission.

Post #125972link

jes_lawson
February 27, 2004 4:24 PM

quote:

A true liberal wishes their political enemies could be beaten into silence and submission.

And a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged.

C'mon people - the same thing that's happening now happened with The Last Temptation of Christ. And that Madonna video. And The Passion of St. Tibulus. Any film that aims to push boundaries of perception of an established religion is going to attract controversy.

The worst thing about the film is that Mel Gibson was allowed to direct again.

Post #125977link

graykane
February 27, 2004 4:50 PM

quote:
quote:

A true liberal wishes their political enemies could be beaten into silence and submission.

And a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged.

i'm a registered republican. bush is still my sworn enemy. in the end, there can be only one. highlander.

yes, i've been mugged. damn them!!!!

Post #125979link

MaKK_BeNN
February 27, 2004 6:01 PM

Actually I don't think it's the same as The Last Temptation of Christ, I think it was the Christians complaining about that movie then (as also the more conservative people would have a beef with "the latest Madonna video).

I'm not quite sure why it seems like it's the liberals out howling for this movie (aren't they supposed to be tolerant of all religions? Oh right all religions except Christianity, I forgot).

The "best" explanation I've heard is that it's because the movie is anti-semetic, and the best "evidence" I've seen for this is that Mel Gibson's dad might have made some ignorant comments.

Post #125982link

OMG_DaGmAr_6481987
February 27, 2004 6:45 PM

quote:
The "best" explanation I've heard is that it's because the movie is anti-semetic, and the best "evidence" I've seen for this is that Mel Gibson's dad might have made some ignorant comments.

1. ::applauds at Makk for all the comments::
2. Watching the interview of Mel Gibson with Diane Sawyer, he said that he loved his dad but did not want to hear any more about him because it was HIS FATHER. I think he disagreed with what his father said because he said himself that the movie was not anti-semetic and that it was everyone, not just a particular group of people. He also loved his father and didn't want to talk smack about him.
3. The word "passion" in the sense of the movie's title is taken from the original meaning of the word, meaning "suffering." The movie's title is not "This is Your Life, with guest speaker Jesus Christ of Nazereth." It talks about what the crucifixion is like. It was brutal, if you ever read the Gospels.

Post #125985link

fuzzyman
February 27, 2004 6:48 PM

I could barely stand to hear the review on the radio. What the hell is so enjoyable about watching in graphic detail as someone get the shit beat out of them?

That's entertainment? I think Mel Gibson is a sick bastard.

Post #125986link

NooniePuuBunny
February 27, 2004 7:20 PM

quote:
213892

That is wonderful.

And kaufman...you are a sick little monkey (but in a good way, I assure you).

Post #125988link

graykane
February 27, 2004 7:43 PM

quote:
Actually I don't think it's the same as The Last Temptation of Christ, I think it was the Christians complaining about that movie

the guy who wrote the book, Kazantakis, was excommunicated for it, despite him writing it because of his ferverous dedication to his catholicism. kazantakis, that poor bastard, was a tortured soul, both literally and figuratively, after getting excommunicated. his religion meant everything to him.

if mel gibson could have been as artistically beautiful as the last temptation was, then i'd applaud his brutality and his religious expression. but some of those camera shots and his lighting choices are visually retarded (like everything that transpires in the woods) and that female devil figure is annoying. so, i'm complaining because the film is a bad film. if i were mel gibson and i made that film as an expression of my religious beliefs, i'd be ashamed of myself, because i couldn't do for my God what i could do for my own ego (like Hamlet or Braveheart).

Post #125992link

choadwarrior
February 27, 2004 10:32 PM

Post #126005link

Matchbook_Romance
February 28, 2004 12:16 AM

I was tempted to create a thread like this when I first watched it on Wednesday but I was waiting for someone else to do it. Anyways in my opinion, I thought the movie was well done. For me, many images in the movie really struck me and I must admit, I did get emotional. Seems like I'm the only that actually liked the movie =P.

Post #126018link

Trippingbillee
February 28, 2004 1:03 AM

I know a lot of people that loved the movie, because it reminded them of how much LOVE Christ must have had in order to go through such pain.

Fuck that. I know people that survived the Holocaust, lost everyone important to them, were tortured past sanity, and had to move to a country with nothing but the rags on their back. They didn't have a whole religion devoted to them, and now people say it didn't even HAPPEN.

Showing Christ being tortured makes Christians feel moved. It makes the rest of us roll our eyes. He's not the only man/woman who has gone through unimaginable pain for love. Honestly, let Mel and all his cronies feel great about themselves. If I want to know how strong a person can be, I'll talk to Vietnam veterans or my relatives who went through the Holocaust. I don't need to see some 2000 year old dude getting the shit beat out of him.

Post #126024link

DragonXero
February 28, 2004 3:52 AM

I think he's a bit closer to 2040-something.

Post #126029link

UnknownEric
February 28, 2004 7:56 AM

I think I misread the movie title. Sorry.

214531

Post #126041link

andydougan
February 28, 2004 8:37 AM

quote:
I know a lot of people that loved the movie, because it reminded them of how much LOVE Christ must have had in order to go through such pain.

Fuck that. I know people that survived the Holocaust, lost everyone important to them, were tortured past sanity, and had to move to a country with nothing but the rags on their back. They didn't have a whole religion devoted to them, and now people say it didn't even HAPPEN.

Showing Christ being tortured makes Christians feel moved. It makes the rest of us roll our eyes. He's not the only man/woman who has gone through unimaginable pain for love. Honestly, let Mel and all his cronies feel great about themselves. If I want to know how strong a person can be, I'll talk to Vietnam veterans or my relatives who went through the Holocaust. I don't need to see some 2000 year old dude getting the shit beat out of him.



Yeah, I never understood all this "Jesus saves" business. Jesus was meant to have taken on the punishment for our sins, thereby enabling us to get into Heaven, right? But the punishment for our sins was to go to Hell: surely getting beaten up a bit and then crucified can't compare to being in Hell for eternity. So all this "salvation" stuff is bollox.

Post #126045link

MaKK_BeNN
February 28, 2004 1:46 PM

quote:
Showing Christ being tortured makes Christians feel moved. It makes the rest of us roll our eyes.

Then don't watch it.

quote:
Fuck that. I know people that survived the Holocaust, lost everyone important to them, were tortured past sanity, and had to move to a country with nothing but the rags on their back. They didn't have a whole religion devoted to them, and now people say it didn't even HAPPEN.

I didn't "roll my eyes" when Shindler's List came out.

I don't see how people saying the Holocaust never happened relates to the movie.

Or are you saying Judiasm is the only important religion?

Post #126069link

OMG_DaGmAr_6481987
February 28, 2004 5:56 PM

quote:
What the hell is so enjoyable about watching in graphic detail as someone get the shit beat out of them?


Who said it was supposed to be "enjoyable?" I would think that if you didn't like the movie, you'd at least shut up about it and move on to something you did like. How could something that doesn't pertain to you make you feel like that unless it really DOES? Can't you just ignore it like you ignore everything else?

Post #126080link

User #16352
February 28, 2004 6:45 PM

quote:
quote:
What the hell is so enjoyable about watching in graphic detail as someone get the shit beat out of them?


Who said it was supposed to be "enjoyable?" I would think that if you didn't like the movie, you'd at least shut up about it and move on to something you did like. How could something that doesn't pertain to you make you feel like that unless it really DOES? Can't you just ignore it like you ignore everything else?
No, because it's the only thing people are talking about now.

Post #126089link

Zaster
February 28, 2004 8:02 PM

214711

Post #126100link

DragonXero
February 29, 2004 2:17 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
What the hell is so enjoyable about watching in graphic detail as someone get the shit beat out of them?


Who said it was supposed to be "enjoyable?" I would think that if you didn't like the movie, you'd at least shut up about it and move on to something you did like. How could something that doesn't pertain to you make you feel like that unless it really DOES? Can't you just ignore it like you ignore everything else?
No, because it's the only thing people are talking about now.

I don't seem to recall you starting a thread on Laci Peterson.

Post #126123link

MikeyG
February 29, 2004 7:13 AM

At the GAY BAR, GAY BAR, GAY BAR!

Post #126135link

choadwarrior
February 29, 2004 10:55 AM

Dougan--I like the point you make. I've never considered that before.

I'm an athiest, but I'll go see this movie eventually. It won't change my life, but I'm sure I'll appreciate it for what it is and for what it represents.

Post #126151link

Drexle
February 29, 2004 11:29 AM

quote:
Yeah, I never understood all this "Jesus saves" business. Jesus was meant to have taken on the punishment for our sins, thereby enabling us to get into Heaven, right? But the punishment for our sins was to go to Hell: surely getting beaten up a bit and then crucified can't compare to being in Hell for eternity. So all this "salvation" stuff is bollox.

Wow... I'm amazed that I never looked at it that way before.

Post #126153link

TheRetroKat
February 29, 2004 6:59 PM

214919

CONTROVERSY :)

Post #126189link

MaKK_BeNN
February 29, 2004 11:12 PM

quote:
Yeah, I never understood all this "Jesus saves" business. Jesus was meant to have taken on the punishment for our sins, thereby enabling us to get into Heaven, right? But the punishment for our sins was to go to Hell: surely getting beaten up a bit and then crucified can't compare to being in Hell for eternity. So all this "salvation" stuff is bollox.

If you believe in that stuff you would read that after that he supposedly did go to hell before coming back.

Post #126213link

UnknownEric
March 1, 2004 6:34 AM

quote:
If you believe in that stuff you would read that after that he supposedly did go to hell before coming back.
Dude, Buffy sent Angel to a hell dimension for 100 years and you don't see me worshipping Angel.

Okay, you do, but that's beside the point...

Post #126229link

MikeyG
March 1, 2004 7:16 AM

Good point, Dougan. That's an inconsistency that was never really explained to us impressionable little Catholics. Perhaps he died for ORIGINAL SIN, which is yet another guilt-weilding propaganda crux that the church likes to lean on.

For any non-Christians or people who don't know, original sin is allegedly something you are born with. I am surmising it is something to do with the sins of the father visiting the son or whatever. As in the weight of the sins of your parents and ancestors follows you into the womb. Or maybe you're born a sinner because your parents had to make the nasty sex to conceive you.

Anyway, you must be baptized by the church to eliminate this original sin you are born with. Perhaps Jesus died so you can be forgiven for sins your elders committed when you're scarcely old enough to know what that fleshy nub on your hand is that tastes so damn good.

The point is, what does it say about a religion who believes that you are BORN guilty?

Post #126232link

kramer_vs_kramer
March 1, 2004 7:25 AM

I'm all for some kind of religion based around Angel. Although we'd probably end up with some kind of holy war versus the Spike fans.

Post #126234link

flickguy
March 1, 2004 11:16 AM

I guess that's what I get for not signing on to SC on weekends... Lots of discussion to which I am extremely late!

quote:
The only time I think you can argue against a movie being released is if it's very violent and obviously marketed towards children, or will in some way cause riots or uprisings. If you're not doing harm and you're not forcing obscenity where it's not wanted or expected, you are allowed to artistically express whatever you want.

A couple of things about this: #1 -- a movie with this much controversy can lead to riots and uprisings. By your own criterion, you think Passion should not have been released, even though you later go on to defend it? #2 -- I hate the word "obscenity", because different things are obscene to different people. Same with "artistic" and its derivatives. #3 -- Violent movies being marketed towards children: Here I can't agree with you saying a movie shouldn't be released. It's the marketing that should be taken to task. Just because you don't want your kids to see people being hacked to pieces by a guy in a hockey mask doesn't give you the right to tell me I can't see it.

quote:
If Jesus offends you, don't watch the movie.

I have to agree with this 100%. In fact, it applies to all movies.

quote:
I don't see any anti-semitism in the release of the movie. I do see a lot of anti-Christianity though. Could you imagine if Christians were protesting the release of a movie made about Moses?

The anti-semitism is coming from the fact that (or so I've heard) Gibson's version of events puts the blame for crucifying Christ squarely on the shoulders of a Jewish character. While it was the Romans who (or so I've heard) actually ordered Jesus killed, it was a Jewish character (or so I've heard) who convinced the Roman leader(s) to do so. What I'm not getting about these people screaming "anti-semitism" is that these were the events as Christians believe them. Christ Himself was reportedly a Jew. What the hell do you have to complain about? No one (that I know) has said "All Jews are Bad because this one caused my Lord to be crucified"... when in fact, they're all *glad*, because this particular event has allowed them to be Saved from themselves.

As for your comment about a Moses movie... I shouldn't even acknowledge it. Christians BELIEVE that Moses did the things the Old Testament says he did. The difference here is that those of the Jewish faith DO NOT BELIEVE that Christ is the Saviour.

quote:
And MikeyG are you saying Mel Gibson shouldn't have made a movie about Jesus because there are Jews in Hollywood?

Mikey was quoting a joke made by someone else. Yeesh.

If it seems I was specifically picking on you, Makk, because I responded to only your post, please know that this early post had the best things to reply to. The rest of the thread seems to be rehashing. (Including this post, I bet.)

I would, however, like to mention one other thing. Mel Gibson's father, no matter the comments he may or may not have made regarding the holocaust, has absolutely nothing to do with this movie. This was Mel's movie, and Mel's alone. Claiming this movie shouldn't have been made because his father said some naughty things is like saying that Drew Barrymore should automatically get an Oscar because of her legendary family. It doesn't work that way. Get a little perspective!

As for me, I am not Christian. I am not really anything, religious or otherwise. I believe in being good for goodness's sake (with or without Santa Claus coming to town). I don't intend to see Passion. It holds absolutely no interest for me.

I do not, however, intend to blast the film. Or those that will see and enjoy it. Christians are moved by the love of their Saviour. Non-Christians resent the existence of this film for whatever reason.

I simply don't care.

(Then why this overly long post about it?) Dunno. Go fig.

By the way, those were some really great comics -- especially the ones by kaufman and boinky. (Damn you, boinky. I keep wanting to hate you, and you go and make a funny strip.)

Post #126256link

andydougan
March 1, 2004 11:44 AM

quote:
quote:
Yeah, I never understood all this "Jesus saves" business. Jesus was meant to have taken on the punishment for our sins, thereby enabling us to get into Heaven, right? But the punishment for our sins was to go to Hell: surely getting beaten up a bit and then crucified can't compare to being in Hell for eternity. So all this "salvation" stuff is bollox.

If you believe in that stuff you would read that after that he supposedly did go to hell before coming back.

But man's punishment was to spend eternity in Hell. If Jesus doesn't do that, he hasn't suffered enough to redeem us.

Post #126259link

graykane
March 1, 2004 12:21 PM

interesting tidbit of useless info:

ROME, Georgia (AP) -- Tickets at one movie theater screening Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" are being deemed decidedly unholy.

The number 666, which many Christians recognize as the "mark of the beast," is appearing on movie tickets for Gibson's film at a Georgia theater, drawing complaints from some moviegoers.

The machine that prints tickets assigned the number 666 as a prefix on all the tickets for the film, said Gary Smith, owner of the Movies at Berry Square in northwest Georgia. The 666 begins a series of numbers that are listed below the name of the movie, the date, time and price.

"It's from our computer and it's absolutely a coincidence," Smith said. "It has nothing to do with the film company or any vendor. It's completely in our computer."

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/South/03/01/offbeat.passion.ap/index.html

Post #126266link

Zaster
March 1, 2004 1:40 PM

quote:
But man's punishment was to spend eternity in Hell. If Jesus doesn't do that, he hasn't suffered enough to redeem us.
So true. I'll bet he never once even stood in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Post #126274link

MaKK_BeNN
March 1, 2004 2:28 PM

quote:
A couple of things about this: #1 -- a movie with this much controversy can lead to riots and uprisings.

The only "controversy" is over people not wanting it shown, and I argue this is not reason to stop it from being shown. If there is a problem it is a self-created problem. If bigots wanted to protest and stop a showing of "To Kill a Mockingbird" you wouldn't shut down the movie, that's ridiculous.

quote:
By your own criterion, you think Passion should not have been released, even though you later go on to defend it?

Passion has about as much chance of starting a riot as a Sunday morning church sermon. Get real. Just because people are biased against Christianity doesn't mean it shouldn't be shown.

Or are athiests going to take to the street burning down churches now?

quote:
#2 -- I hate the word "obscenity", because different things are obscene to different people. Same with "artistic" and its derivatives.

Sorry you don't like it but it's a legal word used when talking about limiting speech. There have been some interesting Supreme Court cases on this if you care to read up on it. If you are content with bending over and letting your ass do the talking, by all means do not let me stop you.

quote:
#3 -- Violent movies being marketed towards children: Here I can't agree with you saying a movie shouldn't be released. It's the marketing that should be taken to task. Just because you don't want your kids to see people being hacked to pieces by a guy in a hockey mask doesn't give you the right to tell me I can't see it.

I didn't say it shouldn't be released, I said that's one of the few conceivable grounds I could imagine even arguing against a movie. And there I was talking about the marketing, not the movie itself. It's like advertising cigarettes to children. I am allowed to say "you cannot market cigarettes to children" but still believe cigrattes should be legal.

You bore me and I wonder if those in your company are also frequently bored.

quote:
quote:
If Jesus offends you, don't watch the movie.

I have to agree with this 100%. In fact, it applies to all movies.

But I thought you said people will surely rise up in the streets and riot because of this movie.

If they showed images of Jesus giving a very graphic blowjob to an audience of devout Christian followers, suddenly, without warning, then yes maybe your argument might hold some water. I could see that insighting riots.

For a movie that is so "hated" it seems to be selling a lot of tickets.

quote:
quote:
I don't see any anti-semitism in the release of the movie. I do see a lot of anti-Christianity though. Could you imagine if Christians were protesting the release of a movie made about Moses?

quote:
What I'm not getting about these people screaming "anti-semitism" is that these were the events as Christians believe them. Christ Himself was reportedly a Jew. What the hell do you have to complain about? No one (that I know) has said "All Jews are Bad because this one caused my Lord to be crucified"... when in fact, they're all *glad*, because this particular event has allowed them to be Saved from themselves.

Christianity is based firmly on the foundation of Judiasm. Anyone who complains and throws around the word "anti-semitism" is only hurting themselves. I think the left just wanted a way to justify their anti-christian attitude and the best way to do that is to slander someone with charges of racism.

quote:
As for your comment about a Moses movie... I shouldn't even acknowledge it. Christians BELIEVE that Moses did the things the Old Testament says he did. The difference here is that those of the Jewish faith DO NOT BELIEVE that Christ is the Saviour.

You understand my point unless you are an idiot. If you are that is ok.

What about a movie about Buddah then? There's a double standard and if you don't admit it you are brainwashed.

In any event your argument could still apply to the movie about Jesus. For a religion and Messiah who upholds the tennants of Judiasm they sure do seem to be against the telling of his alleged story in movie form.

quote:
As for me, I am not Christian.

Sodomite!

quote:
I am not really anything, religious or otherwise.

Athiest!

quote:
I believe in being good for goodness's sake

Pagan!

quote:
(with or without Santa Claus coming to town).

Deceiver!

quote:
I don't intend to see Passion.It holds absolutely no interest for me.

You spent a while talking about something that holds no interest for you.

quote:
I do not, however, intend to blast the film. Or those that will see and enjoy it. Christians are moved by the love of their Saviour. Non-Christians resent the existence of this film for whatever reason.

This is a pretty ignorant comment. The story of Jesus can be viewed independant of a Christian faith, and is a pretty interesting story from a lot of perspectives (sociologically, economically, politically, culturally). The existence of Christianity today is also an interesting cultural phenomenon.

I'm curious as to why you would think educated non-christians have a de facto resentment for the film.

quote:
I simply don't care.

Then why did you make your post?

quote:
(Then why this overly long post about it?) Dunno. Go fig.

omg you can ready what I am writing. Maybe you don't care and that's why it seems like you basically said nothing.

Post #126277link

fuzzyman
March 1, 2004 3:25 PM

I don't get why anyone would find watching someone get the shit beat out of them for two hours entertaining. Just listening to the review on the radio made me sick.

Okay, Jesus suffered. Is anything gained by seeing it in graphic, gory detail? I won't even go into how concentrating on this one (albiet dramatic) part of the Jesus story, presented outside of the context of the story, Misses The Point Entirely(tm).

Mel Gibson is one sick bastard. That's what I think.

Post #126284link

andydougan
March 1, 2004 5:29 PM

I'd like to go to see the film just because so many self-righteous people are complaining about it. The only thing putting me off is that it looks a bit crap.

Post #126293link

MaKK_BeNN
March 1, 2004 6:53 PM

quote:
I don't get why anyone would find watching someone get the shit beat out of them for two hours entertaining. Just listening to the review on the radio made me sick.

Okay, Jesus suffered. Is anything gained by seeing it in graphic, gory detail? I won't even go into how concentrating on this one (albiet dramatic) part of the Jesus story, presented outside of the context of the story, Misses The Point Entirely(tm).

Mel Gibson is one sick bastard. That's what I think.



Then don't watch it.

Requiem for a Dream is basically like watching someone getting beaten to death for two hours, and the only point of Kill Bill as far as I can see was to show dismemberment on screen. Not a big deal to anyone but the critics, as long as this isn't taking anyone by surprise (through deceptive marketing).

What you are probably missing is the context devout Christians are taking going into the movie, that the suffering he goes through is for mankind. If you are completely ignorant to Christian doctrine "The Last Temptation of Christ" is a pretty good overview of doctrine (though a pretty liberal artistic interpretation of Jesus himself versus how most religions want him painted).

It's also just a good movie...Unless you're SCARED? Are you SCARED, SCARDY?? EH?? Harvey Keitel as Judas is some very good casting.

quote:
I'd like to go to see the film just because so many self-righteous people are complaining about it. The only thing putting me off is that it looks a bit crap.

Yeah I kind of wonder if the "controversy" is intentional public relations, because at this point I basically want to vote with my dollars in favor of free speech.

I just think it's one of the least interesting parts of the Jesus story (and factually the most unclear, I think that's the area where the main books of the gospel differ the most radically, the whole ressurection mumbo jumbo aside).

Post #126303link

Forum archives » Fights Go Here » The P(ASS)ion of the Christ

« Prev Page 1 of 5 Next »
stripcreator
Make a comic
Forums
featuring
diesel sweeties
jerkcity
exploding dog
goats
ko fight club
penny arcade
chopping block
also
Brad Sucks