1:) You must include one instance of the WIGU Donkey, (or cow, or horsey, or whatever the fuck that is.)

2): You must include one instance of the Exploding Dog Stick Man thinking.

3): You must use the phrase: "I was young and pretty once" somewhere in the comic.

Rock on, then....

bunner

Here's one:

13354

13355

13362
Let the unfunny commence.

The title is from my finally going for sick humor. I don't know why it took me so long.

http://www.stripcreator.com/view.php?ID=13372
13372

13387

PS - Wirthling sucks. I hope Idaho eats him.

Hrm, just imagine, some little kid with glasses will be eating Mr. Ed.

Hrm....
Gabe, you were a paste eater as a child, weren't you?

13464

http://www.stripcreator.com/view.php?ID=13477
13477

While I am certain this one will not win, due to the DexX Comic Contest Victory Condition Theorem[1], I would like to state for the record that I quite like it. :)

[1] This theorem postulates that the degree to which a context entrant likes his or her own entry is inversely proportionate to the likelihood of that entry winning. Hence, you can only win a contest if you think your entry sucks, and if you really like your effort, it will not even come close.

quote:

---

Hrm, just imagine, some little kid with glasses will be eating Mr. Ed.

Hrm....
Gabe, you were a paste eater as a child, weren't you?

---

I swear I've had conversations like this:

13520

http://www.stripcreator.com/view.php?ID=13533
13533

According to the DCCVCT, this one's got a pretty poor chance as well. But then, I think all the entries so far have been good, so I guess there's no shame in losing to any of them.

Unfortunately, here's this...

13630

You magnificent bastard. It'd be so much easier to loathe you if you weren't so damn funny.

DexX laughs until his stomach hurts.

Shit, looks like wirthling's won again. I'm still giggling. :)

Having carefully read all o the posts in the "Has Anyone Not Done These" thread, I have had a profound religious, err, uh, thingy.... and I have decided that all contests are wrong.

Since I know that none of you would want a fellow comic stripper to violate their religious beliefs, I must declare all of your work as sinful, and I must remain the winner in perpetuity until Baaz returns in the holy helicopter with sunscreen for all of mankind.

bunner,

reading the news posts while drunk,

again

Wow. You may really be on to something with your DCCVCT, DexX. I thought mine was lame.

On the other hand, maybe it really is lame and those of you who like it are just 'tards. Hmmm, maybe I'll call that theory the MIRILATOYWLIAJT theory...

quote:

---

...until Baaz returns in the holy helicopter with sunscreen for all of mankind.

---

quote:

---

Wow. You may really be on to something with your DCCVCT, DexX. I thought mine was lame.

On the other hand, maybe it really is lame and those of you who like it are just 'tards. Hmmm, maybe I'll call that theory the MIRILATOYWLIAJT theory...

---

Dang.... this is perplexing. I had already picked a winner, but everybody thinks that wirthling should win. If I don't pick wirthling's comic, everybody will say it's because I'm getting back at him for being a pissy, pedantic, smirking fuck.

hmmmm....

That's not true, though. The degree to which he sucks carries more than enough punishment for any such overwrought priggery that he might dish out.

hmmmm....

Ah, well. Piss on it. Nuke me. This is what you get for letting somebody who can't properly parse the more semantical aspects of a dichotmy, after doing two shows and closing the late night pub, win a comics contest.

The two runners up were -and no, there's no irony in this. Turn off that fucking Alanis Morisette CD-

....wirthling and gabe.

And the winner is:

13520

This just rocked.

Take it away, Scyess.

(How do you pronounce that, btw?)

Good choice. I love nonsequiturs and are those Bugle Boy jeans you're wearing?

Why yes, they are Bugle Boy jeans. Will you look at the size of that marmoset!

Funny thing about that marmoset - my wife and I were discussing floral wallpaper just the other day.

I am so ashamed - I just looked up non sequitur in the dictionary to get a precise meaning, and realised when I found it that I should have known it all along. I am doing a BA with a double major in linguistics and philosophy, and I am tending toward logic and applied philosophy for the latter. A non sequitur is conclusion that does not follow from the premises of the argument, literally "it does not follow". For those who have done a bit of logic, it is either deductively invalid or inductively weak.

For example:
Premise 1 - I put an undamaged loaf of bread in the kitchen last night.
Premise 2 - This morning there is a hole in the bag and the bread has big holes ripped in it.
Premise 3 - There are small droppings on the kitchen floor.

Conclusion - Therefore my house has been broken into by a bread-vandal whose trademark calling-card is to scatter rodent droppings on the floor.

That's an inductive non sequitur - an extremely weak argument. A deductive non sequitur is pretty simple:

P1 - All dogs are mammals.
P2 - All poodles are dogs.
C - Therefore, I am the King of Spain.

There you go, a quick lesson in inductive and deductive logic.

I just deduced thatyou're on crack DexX! Was I close?? ;)I mean first the Impulse thing..now this ;)

Somebody want to go and pry the crack pipe out of Scyess's Bic burnt fingers and get his ass in gear?

CC27 awaits.

quote:

---

I just deduced thatyou're on crack DexX! Was I close?? ;)I mean first the Impulse thing..now this ;)

---