|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| Welcome back. Today, Benghazi in Benghazi has Benghazi a Benghazi Benghazi. | |
 | |  |
|
 |
| | |
| Joining us is a generic conservative. What do you think? | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| Clearly, the administration has Benghazi the Benghazi Benghazi for Benghazi in the Benghazi. And furthermore, Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi. | |
| | |
|
 |
| | |
| Right. And what's more, Benghazi Benghazi. But what about Benghazi? | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| It was only Benghazi when Benghazi first Benghazi for Benghazi Benghazi. Benghazi. | |
| | |
|
 |
| | |
| Good grief, has anyone seen the remote? I think Fox News is broken. | |
| | |
|
|
|
