Yeah... that must be it. You "mentioned" my sanity in a manner that was "questioning", so now I must be "defending" my sanity, yeah... Trying, desperately, to make a case for my sanity.. yeah! Cause we all know that if somebody of your lofty sense of the world in general calls one's sanity into question... weh heh hellllll, mister.... they just better hop to it and PROVE they're not nuts!
Does this shit ususally work on people in general, or are you just trying it out on me?
I swear I am lauging my ass off, here. Maybe I oughta go to one o` them, there "laughin' academies!"
HAW!
Sorry, that's all the time I have to entertain kneejerk inference and insult, today. Now... If I may slip out of the papier mache` straightjacket that you seem to think fits anybody who smells something fishy near the pond...
You may well sit there - hell, you DO sit there, baselessly pompous and dismissive as usual - and try and fit me for a tinfoil hat, but history, sirrah, history is chocked full of shit that absolutely could not have happened when and where it happened.
That's why people read it.
You should, too.
Did Bush burn the Reichstag?
Fuck if I know. Only I KNOW that I don't know, and I'm not deludued enough to think that anything but history will bear out what DID happen, and I'm certainly not anywhere near delududed enough to believe that people in power only do very holy and moral things to achieve the best results for those whom they govern, so long as they're Americans®. That sort of thinking is the result of that, there "propoganda" that you keep going on about, see?
I do know that I have about as much interest in free psychoanalysis from somebody who thinks that the world is just hunkey dory - and only lunatics and sad sacks say otherwise - as you are in being told, by somebody that you think is a tinfoil hat model, that you have no sense of history.
I guess I'll just have to start crossing the street when I see you coming in this thread, too, (It seems to be the result you're going for) because endlessly shell-gaming statements as soon as they land on your table and then replying with cheap insult, so thinly veiled that the whole point of the reply seems only to be how thinly they CAN be veiled, might be the stuff of politicians' debates, but I'm not running for anything. And I sure as hell ain't voting for you.
The only thing that remains to be seen is whether you shall respond with:
"My, you certainly seem upset about that innocent comment about your sanity. Have I touched a nerve?"
or
"I have no idea what sort of ranting you're going on about, but (string of loose facts here, signifying nothing)"
or....
"If all you can do is ridicule and attack, obviously it is YOU who cannpt offer topical debate, like us big fellas here... who.. blah, blah, blah...."
One thing is for sure... You will reply.
That's all you do.
: )
---
I wanted my half in the middle and I wound up on the edge.