|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| You replaced one of my missing pawns whose absence would have given you an advantage, so as a reward, the judge gave you an extra pawn, which gives you the same advantage that you had corrected. | |
 | |  |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| How do you think I feel: if that pawn leads to my winning the match, then automatically that win is contestable if not outright illegitimate. | |
| | |
|
 |
| | |
| That's the point, silly. This is a WWF tournament. He's not a judge, he's a ref. His objective is to rig the game in your favor so that mmyers & evil zak will take a chair upside your head. | |
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
| I feel so much better now. | |
| | |
|
|
| | |
| Yippee. I'll get the chair ready. | |
| | |
|
|
|
