Forum archives » General Discussion » Daisy Cutters

« Prev Page 1 of 2 Next »

arrandildocompany
November 8, 2001 10:07 PM

How cool is this?!?

Post #25570link

gabe_billings
November 9, 2001 2:52 AM

Typical injuries include concussion, blindness, rupture of the eardrums, seared airways and collapsed lungs, multiple internal haemorrhages, displaced and torn internal organs.

Wow, what a great Christmas present.

Post #25590link

boorite
November 9, 2001 8:04 AM

That should stop terrorism.

Post #25616link

kramer_vs_kramer
November 9, 2001 8:06 AM

Until the terrorists get one.

Post #25617link

NastyPope
November 9, 2001 8:09 AM

quote:
Typical injuries include concussion, blindness, rupture of the eardrums, seared airways and collapsed lungs, multiple internal haemorrhages, displaced and torn internal organs.

Reminds me of the last party I went to.

Post #25618link

boorite
November 9, 2001 9:11 AM

quote:
Until the terrorists get one.
We wouldn't want that. They might use it to terrorize people, instead of for infinite justice.

Post #25627link

DexX
November 9, 2001 9:57 AM

I loved the smug military fuckhead I saw chatting about the daisycutter on the news. He actually grinned as he said something along the lines of, "It's designed to kill people, lots of people." Wow! What a great application of technology!

[rant]

This is typical of the US military, though. Any armed outing is an excuse to test new weapons or more powerful versions of the old ones. In Panama they tested out a MASER weapon (like a laser, but based on microwaves instead of light). I saw some gut-churning footage of a victim of that weapon - basically, his flesh had partially liquefied, and his muscles were dangling from his bones in ragged ropes. There is no tactical need to use these weapons in these circumstances. It is simply an ecuse to test them, or to test an old weapon in a new environment. As far as I am aware, this started with Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but probably goes back further.

[/rant]

*sigh*

Post #25637link

bunnerabb
November 9, 2001 11:45 AM

Yeah.... That's true. All of the other militaries of every other nation only want to slap people around a bit, and would never be smug or dance in the streets over doing something as horrid as oh, say, killing thousands of people. When will the US Military ever learn that when they kill the enemy, it's genocide, but when other armies do it, it's retaliation for oppression? I feel so ashamed.

Post #25649link

Spankling
November 9, 2001 11:58 AM

[way over the top insane rant]
I'm just glad that we will see an end to terrorism soon. That will be great! I'm sure this campaign will be completely effective and not just fun and games for millionaires. Say, anyone for a massive tax cut? Not me! Let the corporations have it. That's the only patriotic thing to do.
[/way over the top insane rant]

Sorry. Just clearing some bile.

Post #25654link

bunnerabb
November 9, 2001 12:07 PM

[logical statement]Fuck millionaires. Corporate welfare is bullshit.[/logical statement]

[also logical statement, but soon to be contested] Then again, all forms of welfare pretty much just create poverty.[/also logical statement, but soon to be contested]

Post #25656link

boorite
November 9, 2001 12:45 PM

Welfare "as we know it" is actually a means of controlling the poor. It may be an overstatement to say it creates poverty, but it certainly is not designed to stop it, either. It's designed to preserve the system as is, which requires not raising the prospects of the poor. So you could say it perpetuates poverty. But then so do a lot of things.

(I'm talking mostly about means-tested programs in the US.)

Post #25670link

gabe_billings
November 9, 2001 1:03 PM

[non-sequitur]I like toast.[/non-sequitur]

Post #25678link

Spankling
November 9, 2001 1:04 PM

quote:
Welfare "as we know it" is actually a means of controlling the poor. It may be an overstatement to say it creates poverty, but it certainly is not designed to stop it, either. It's designed to preserve the system as is, which requires not raising the prospects of the poor. So you could say it perpetuates poverty. But then so do a lot of things.

(I'm talking mostly about means-tested programs in the US.)


*Spankling stamps his walking stick on the wood floor as a sign of support.*

Post #25680link

andydougan
November 9, 2001 1:23 PM

If my surname was Cutter, I'd call my daughter Daisy. Or Toe.

Post #25693link

DragonXero
November 9, 2001 1:26 PM

Am I the only one who just wants to see things go boom?

Am I also the only one who wants to see that daisy pattern? Weapons of mass destruction that leave pretty patterns make me drool. :)

Post #25694link

andydougan
November 9, 2001 1:37 PM

41186

Post #25697link

Spankling
November 9, 2001 1:42 PM

quote:
If my surname was Cutter, I'd call my daughter Daisy. Or Toe.
Or cheese...

Post #25703link

boorite
November 9, 2001 1:52 PM

42108

Post #25709link

DragonXero
November 9, 2001 1:53 PM

There are honestly too many points on either side.

Again, I want to see explosions. They can detonate them in the sky and hurt no one if they want. they can use the damn things to level buildings to put new ones up. I just want to see them go BOOM.

Post #25710link

DragonXero
November 9, 2001 2:31 PM

quote:
42108
Well, the mountains look fine. :)

Post #25724link

boorite
November 9, 2001 2:37 PM

Exactly.

Post #25728link

Spankling
November 9, 2001 2:49 PM

quote:
Exactly.
Nothing changed.

Post #25731link

DragonXero
November 9, 2001 2:58 PM

Stop using the stripcreator for deep thoughts.
I wasn't prepared to look past the surface on that one. Bastard.

Can we just drop them on the Canadians? No one will miss them.

Post #25734link

ObiJo
November 9, 2001 2:58 PM

quote:
Yeah.... That's true. All of the other militaries of every other nation only want to slap people around a bit, and would never be smug or dance in the streets over doing something as horrid as oh, say, killing thousands of people. When will the US Military ever learn that when they kill the enemy, it's genocide, but when other armies do it, it's retaliation for oppression? I feel so ashamed.
Dig it.

In the "Things I've learned at stripcreator.com" you said you hadn't realized how many people resent the shit out of America till you came here.

Ditto.

I have little doubt that America does some fucked up things. But I also have little doubt that all countries do. I think the US gets superfluous ridicule because it's the big dog and some citizens of other countries inherently resent the shit out of that.

I mean, hell, call me crazy, but if I lived in Zimbabwe, I'd be more interested in what Zimbabwe was doing wrong.

Post #25736link

bunnerabb
November 9, 2001 3:12 PM

One of my favourite P.J. O'Rourke stories is where he is being held at gunpoint buy some crazed Islamic fundamentalist who is calling him an "American, Imperialist infidel pig" or the like, and in the same breath, tells him that as soon as he gets a green card, he's going to study dentistry in Michigan.

Yeah, I'm quite worried about America.

Post #25740link

DexX
November 9, 2001 7:50 PM

quote:
Yeah.... That's true. All of the other militaries of every other nation only want to slap people around a bit, and would never be smug or dance in the streets over doing something as horrid as oh, say, killing thousands of people. When will the US Military ever learn that when they kill the enemy, it's genocide, but when other armies do it, it's retaliation for oppression? I feel so ashamed.
Bunner, plenty of words come out of my mouth on their own. There is no need for you to put any more in there. I have said many times on this forum that I am against war and killing in general, so I'm not going to say anything in support of a pack of arseholes who crash passenger jets into civilian buildings and kill thousands, and I have no love for the Taliban either. However, the world's policeman is guilty of an awful lot of the shit they attack others for. Here's a fun bit of info for you...

During the early nineties, when the UN wanted to do weapon inspection trips around Iraq, Hussein told them to bugger off, because he said that the US would put spies in amongst the weapon inspectors and catalogue his weapons for military purposes. This refusal was the primary reason given for the US to bomb the living shit out of his country. A few years later, it came to light that the CIA had in fact put spies in place in the weapon inspection teams. Hussein's paranoia has actually been correct, and his reason for refusing the inspections - the very reason the US attacked his country - was valid.

What fun.

Now, bunnerabb, if you want to try to defend the idea that killing millions of innocent Afghans will somehow put a stop to terrorism, you are free to try, but I can't imagine you will have a lot of luck coming up with convincing arguments. I would argue the opposite, that this sustained and unjustifiable spasm of vengeful aggression will make a lot more people hate the US, and terrorist attacks will increase and intensify.

I am also cynical enough to think that it is possible that this is a deliberate plan by the US military. They need to justify their trillion dollar budget somehow, and if they could start a long, drawn-out multinational conflict... No, I am not saying this is true, but I think it is possible.

Post #25820link

bunnerabb
November 9, 2001 8:12 PM

I'm not "for" war. I think only an idiot is "for" war. If it comes out that the Pentagon and the CIA thought it would be a good idea to fly some airplanes into shit and blame it on Afghanistan and start a fucking war, I will be the first one on the boat to anywhere else.

On the other hand, only a moron would let their nose be rubbed in the blood of their innocent dead and wring their hands and say "Golly" as a response.

We shall see, my old man always said, what we shall see.

Post #25831link

arrandildocompany
November 9, 2001 8:30 PM

quote:
If my surname was Cutter, I'd call my daughter Daisy. Or Toe.

Or Roll. Get it?!? Rullkotter!!! Ha ha ha!

Post #25839link

DexX
November 11, 2001 8:24 AM

I am depressed, angry, and confused today.

On Saturday, Australia had a federal election. All the polls said that the conservative wealth-loving poor-people-fucking government that has already had two nightmarish terms of office would be voted out in a landslide.

They won.

I have always been proud to be an Australian. I thought that, on the whole, Australians were smart, clever, capable, and good people. Until today. Today I want to find every person who voted for the current government and scream at them. "Are you fucking blind? We have zero economic growth, our dollar is at the lowest value it has ever been, our unemployment rate is about to hit double digits, and the tax system has gone through five years of re-structuring so it targets the poor instead of the rich!!! What is wrong with you people???"

Today I am ashamed to be an Australian.

Sorry all, but I really needed to vent that bit of bile. We now return to the scheduled programming...

Post #26162link

itsclark
November 11, 2001 8:47 AM

quote:
Today I am ashamed to be an Australian.

Post #26168link

andydougan
November 11, 2001 10:29 AM

quote:
I am depressed, angry, and confused today.

On Saturday, Australia had a federal election. All the polls said that the conservative wealth-loving poor-people-fucking government that has already had two nightmarish terms of office would be voted out in a landslide.

They won.

I have always been proud to be an Australian. I thought that, on the whole, Australians were smart, clever, capable, and good people. Until today. Today I want to find every person who voted for the current government and scream at them. "Are you fucking blind? We have zero economic growth, our dollar is at the lowest value it has ever been, our unemployment rate is about to hit double digits, and the tax system has gone through five years of re-structuring so it targets the poor instead of the rich!!! What is wrong with you people???"

Today I am ashamed to be an Australian.



Now you know how I feel about this country.

Post #26204link

ladyjdotnet
November 11, 2001 10:30 AM

quote:
Today I am ashamed to be an Australian.


Move to Nebraska. You can be my personal masseur.

No wait, Nebraska's run by conservative fuckwits, too.

Post #26206link

JrnymnNate
November 11, 2001 10:48 AM

It must just burn you up ladyj, to have a president like we do, and then see that he has the highest aproval rating ever in history.

Post #26215link

andydougan
November 11, 2001 10:51 AM

A dead tapeworm would have a high approval rating at a time like this.

Post #26217link

fuzzyman
November 11, 2001 11:00 AM

quote:
It must just burn you up ladyj, to have a president like we do, and then see that he has the highest aproval rating ever in history.
Actually, his father had the highest approval rating in history. And he still lost to my man, Bill!

Post #26223link

JrnymnNate
November 11, 2001 11:06 AM

ok, i admit, people would say yes its good he's striking back no matter who he was at a time like this.

And i meant how he had 98% during 9/12 - 9/30

Post #26225link

ladyjdotnet
November 11, 2001 2:43 PM

quote:
A dead tapeworm would have a high approval rating at a time like this.

Hear, hear.

Post #26270link

descolada99
November 11, 2001 3:09 PM

quote:
A dead tapeworm would have a high approval rating at a time like this.

I second that motion...

Post #26278link

itsclark
November 11, 2001 5:54 PM

The "Dead Tapeworm" party never stood a chance and you know it. Too many last minute defections to Ralph Nader.

Post #26295link

descolada99
November 11, 2001 7:28 PM

quote:
The "Dead Tapeworm" party never stood a chance and you know it. Too many last minute defections to Ralph Nader.

Yeah, but if Nader was smart he would have realized that the dead tapeworms stood a better chance of getting elected than himself and would have supported more of his ideas than the other party.

Post #26309link

ObiJo
November 13, 2001 3:21 AM

quote:
On Saturday, Australia had a federal election. All the polls said that the conservative wealth-loving poor-people-fucking government that has already had two nightmarish terms of office would be voted out in a landslide.

They won.

I have always been proud to be an Australian. I thought that, on the whole, Australians were smart, clever, capable, and good people. Until today.


I don't know anything about Australia's party system or this past election. I preface what I'm about to say with that, so there is no confusion.

In this country, conservatives have an annual meeting in Houston that I attend. There are only two items on the agenda:

    1.How can we acquire more wealth since we love it so much.
    2.How can we:
      2a.Find poor people
      2b.Fuck them.
Then we raid the titty bars and tell nigger jokes all night.

That's who we are. That's what we do.

OR

You can get rid of the all-too-easy wide-sweeping disparagements about conservatism and conservatives and look at what they have to say about, say:


  • a child's right to live
  • the unfair nature of the progressive tax
  • the irresponsibility of a tax and spend government

You may not agree with them, but maybe you can erase their horns and pitchfork from your mental image. I've never thought of those differing from my opinion in such an all-encompassing evil light.

But then again, as I've often been told, I'm not as open-minded as liberals.

___________________________________________

I'll ask this again: can't we move these kinds of threads over to "Fights go Here"? Having these kinds of discussions with a group of people who have different (and sometimes frustrating) political ideas from me, on a site I come to just for the funny, is getting taxing.

I don't want to limit what's talked about on this site. I would just encourage everyone to use the stratification that Brad has set up with the different forums and put any potentially-divisive threads over there. (Or maybe we could even convince Brad to set up a separate political forum.)

I don't want your politics messing with my donkey sodomy.

Post #26650link

ladyjdotnet
November 13, 2001 5:42 AM

No one was really arguing. There's a difference between debate and fighting.

As long as no one gets pissy about another's views, this is very certainly "general discussion".

Just like a republican, to be in favor of stratification.

*wink*

Post #26662link

boorite
November 13, 2001 8:10 AM

quote:
I have little doubt that America does some fucked up things. But I also have little doubt that all countries do.

There's one difference. This is a democracy, and we live here, so we can do something about the crimes of our government.

Post #26687link

boorite
November 13, 2001 9:06 AM

The Iraqis also objected to weapons inspections for another, more obvious reason, which was that a state of open hostility still existed between the US and Iraq, and yet the US insisted on having inspectors on the UN team. Iraq did not exactly refuse the inspection. They barred 6 Americans on a 75-member UNSCOM team. Imagine if Iraq insisted on inspecting US military facilities.

Saddam Hussein showed no hesitation in using weapons of mass destruction on his own people-- a fact that, before the invasion of Kuwait, did nothing to dampen Bush's support for the dictator-- and so weapons inspections were a desirable goal. The US sabotaged that goal by insisting on terms that it knew Iraw could not accept. Weapons of mass destruction, and their use on the Kurds, could not have possibly been the issue. If it were, we would have insisted, on penalty of bombing, that inspections be carried out in Turkey. Instead, we gave Turkey massive material support and pushed to get them into NATO.

For great justice.

Post #26702link

Kevin_Keegans_Perm
November 14, 2001 1:14 AM

quote:
quote:
I am depressed, angry, and confused today.

On Saturday, Australia had a federal election. All the polls said that the conservative wealth-loving poor-people-fucking government that has already had two nightmarish terms of office would be voted out in a landslide.

They won.

I have always been proud to be an Australian. I thought that, on the whole, Australians were smart, clever, capable, and good people. Until today. Today I want to find every person who voted for the current government and scream at them. "Are you fucking blind? We have zero economic growth, our dollar is at the lowest value it has ever been, our unemployment rate is about to hit double digits, and the tax system has gone through five years of re-structuring so it targets the poor instead of the rich!!! What is wrong with you people???"

Today I am ashamed to be an Australian.



Now you know how I feel about this country.

Come join us on the Isle of Man Andy.

5% basic tax rate. Government that doesnt interfere in your life in any way at all. Zero unemployment. Nice weather , the beach never more than 30 minutes away , all mod cons , and an almost non existent crime rate

Course , you have to earn over £30k a year to afford a house , but thats small fry to a man of your experience.

Post #26860link

DexX
November 14, 2001 7:22 AM

Well, Obi, you have a friend here on one issue - I share your extremely unpopular view that abortion is a bad thing, and that unborn human beings have just as much of a right to life as those who have spent some time outside the womb.

Let the flames begin. ;)

Post #26894link

boorite
November 14, 2001 7:58 AM

Extremely unpopular? Not here. The most recent Gallup poll shows an even 46-46 split between "pro-choice" and "pro-life." That's extraordinary, because the average over the past several years is more like 48-43. Still, it's pretty even, and it might surprise you to know that "pro-life" has actually gained a lot of ground since 1995, when the score was 56-33 in favor of choice.

Post #26903link

fuzzyman
November 14, 2001 8:21 AM

quote:
Extremely unpopular? Not here. The most recent Gallup poll shows an even 46-46 split.

The most recent Gallup poll on this issue I'm seeing is this, which shows the 2001 yearly average to be 50% pro-choice, 41% pro-life.

It is true that the August 10-12 poll showed a 46/46 slit. However, the August 3-5 poll showed a 52/39 split in favor of pro-choice, and a 50/40 split the poll before that.

All this means is that there are sampling variations in each poll, depending on who you happen to talk to. Over the course of many polls, however, you will see an average that is representative. Eventually, over the course of years or months, you will see trends.

See below:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/indicators/indabortion.asp

Interestingly, while a large portion of the population identify themselves as pro-life, only 1% of the population identifies it as their most important issue. Only 17% of the population feels that abortion should be outlawed in all cases.

Post #26907link

boorite
November 14, 2001 8:52 AM

Yes, as I said, 46-46 is extraordinary, and I'd be surprised if the numbers for the year wandered far off the 48-43 mark. Maybe 49-42, which is still a pretty even split, as these things go. All this is to question the characterization of "pro-life" as "extremely unpopular."

Post #26912link

boorite
November 14, 2001 9:05 AM

Also, it's worth emphasizing that one out of six Americans polled think that abortion should be illegal in all cases, which presumably covers pregnancies that result from rape or threaten the life of the mother. One out of six holds this extreme view. I'm going to be thinking about that one.

Post #26914link

Forum archives » General Discussion » Daisy Cutters

« Prev Page 1 of 2 Next »
stripcreator
Make a comic
Forums
featuring
diesel sweeties
jerkcity
exploding dog
goats
ko fight club
penny arcade
chopping block
also
Brad Sucks