Forum archives » Fights Go Here » Did someone mention politics?

« Prev Page 1 of 74 Next »

DexX
July 10, 2002 10:40 AM

Post #57652link

KajunFirefly
July 10, 2002 11:50 AM

John Pilger, you magnificent bastard.

Post #57662link

Kevin_Keegans_Perm
July 10, 2002 4:18 PM

Brilliance.

And the only people who dont see this are .... Americans.

Post #57705link

andydougan
July 10, 2002 5:41 PM

THA'TS RACEIST!!!1!121

And I have a suspicion old Tone may not see it either.

Post #57713link

Tinman
July 11, 2002 5:57 AM

Fantastic. That guy TELLS IT LIKE IT IS.

I feel more intelligent already, check his website, it's a mine of information for people who like to be righteously indignant.

Post #57757link

boorite
July 12, 2002 3:27 PM

You limey twats. All your base, motherfuckers.

Post #57921link

boorite
July 12, 2002 3:31 PM

But really, the US is a scary place. A recitation of the facts will make people think you're from Mars. And I'm not writing from some cornfield in Nebraska. I live 12 minutes from the Capitol.

MUST OBEY STATE

Post #57922link

DexX
July 15, 2002 11:05 PM

Five Dumbest Things on Wall Street - more of that funny/depressing paradox.

Post #58306link

Spankling
July 26, 2002 8:37 PM

Has everyone seen this already?

================================
Band of Roving Chief Executives Spotted Miles from Mexican Border!
San Antonio, Texas (Reuters) - Unwilling to wait for their eventual indictments, the 10,000 remaining CEOs of public U.S. companies made a break for it yesterday, heading for the Mexican border, plundering towns and villages along the way, and writing the entire rampage off as a marketing expense.
"They came into my home, made me pay for my own TV, then double-booked the revenues," said Rachel Sanchez of Las Cruces, just north of El Paso. "Right in front of my daughters."
Calling themselves the CEOnistas, the chief executives were first spotted last night along the Rio Grande River near Quemado, where they bought each of the town's 320 residents by borrowing against pension fund gains. By late this morning, the CEOnistas had arbitrarily inflated Quemado's population to 960, and declared a 200 percent profit for the fiscal second quarter.
This morning, the outlaws bought the city of Waco, transferred its underperforming areas to a private partnership, and sent a bill to California for $4.5 billion.
Law enforcement officials and disgruntled shareholders riding posse were noticeably frustrated. "First of all, they're very hard to find because they always stand behind their numbers, and the numbers keep shifting," said posse spokesman Carl Horn. "And every time we yell 'Stop in the name of the shareholders!' they refer us to investor relations. I've been on the phone all damn morning."
"YOU'LL NEVER AUDIT ME ALIVE!" they scream. The pursuers said they have had some success, however, by preying on a common executive weakness. "Last night we caught about 24 of them by disguising one of our female officers as a CNBC anchor," said U.S. Border Patrol spokesperson Janet Lewis. "It was like moths to a flame."
Also, teams of agents have been using high-powered listening devices to scan the plains for telltale sounds of the CEOnistas. "Most of the time we just hear leaves rustling or cattle flicking their tails," said Lewis, "but occasionally we'll pick up someone saying, 'I was totally out of the loop on that."
Among former and current CEOs apprehended with this method were Computer Associates' Sanjay Kumar, Adelphia's John Rigas, Enron's Ken Lay, Joseph Nacchio of Qwest, Joseph Berardino of Arthur Andersen, and every Global Crossing CEO since 1997. ImClone Systems' Sam Waksal and Dennis Kozlowski of Tyco were not allowed to join the CEOnistas as they have already been indicted.
So far, about 50 chief executives have been captured, including Martha Stewart, who was detained south of El Paso where she had cut through a barbed-wire fence at the Zaragosa border crossing off Highway 375. "She would have gotten away, but she was stopping motorists to ask for marzipan and food coloring so she could make edible snowman place settings, using the cut pieces of wire for the arms," said Border Patrol officer Jenette Cushing. "We put her in cell No. 7, because the morning sun really adds texture to the stucco walls."
While some stragglers are believed to have successfully crossed into Mexico, Cushing said the bulk of the CEOnistas have holed themselves up at the Alamo. "No, not the fort, the car rental place at the airport," she said. "They're rotating all the tires on the minivans and accounting for each change as a sale."

Post #58980link

Spankling
July 26, 2002 9:28 PM

Post #58992link

Kevin_Keegans_Perm
July 27, 2002 5:59 AM

Guess Whos Back
Back Again
Spankys Back
Tell a Friend

Post #59017link

Spankling
July 29, 2002 8:19 PM

This is the funniest thing I've read in a while. Maybe it's not strictly politics, but close enough.

Post #59242link

fuzzyman
July 29, 2002 8:32 PM

Linkee no workee.

Post #59247link

DexX
July 29, 2002 8:39 PM

Did you mean this one, regarding the monks fighting over the chair?

Post #59250link

Spankling
July 29, 2002 9:30 PM

Post #59264link

Spankling
July 30, 2002 8:46 PM

Cheney is such a dick.

White House Security Rebuffs Attempt to Serve Lawsuit on Dick Cheney
By Susan Jones
CNSNews.com Morning Editor
July 26, 2002

(CNSNews.com) - The legal group that's made a name for itself by filing numerous lawsuits against the nation's leaders is having trouble serving its latest complaint against Vice President Dick Cheney.

Judicial Watch says a process server was threatened with arrest when he went to the White House on Monday, July 22, to deliver a copy of the legal complaint against Dick Cheney on behalf of Halliburton shareholders.

Judicial Watch accuses Cheney, the former chairman of Halliburton, of overstating company revenues. The Securities and Exchange Commission announced it is investigating how Halliburton accounted for cost overruns on construction jobs.

According to Judicial Watch, a White House security officer refused to accept any papers for the vice president. The process server said he was told he would be arrested if he simply dropped the federal court summons and complaint on the ground and left.

Judicial Watch notes it is a crime to interfere with the "service of process."

"We have served many a lawsuit on Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Hillary Clinton when they were in the White House," said Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman. "The Clinton White House accepted the papers. Never before have our process servers been threatened with arrest.

"If this Bush-Cheney White House is serious about corporate corruption and responsibility, it would not allow the Vice President to improperly hide behind White House security to evade service of process in the Halliburton securities fraud litigation, and it would not threaten the process server with arrest."

Recent press reports note that Vice President Cheney is keeping a low profile (staying away from TV talk shows and reporters in general) while the controversy over his tenure at Halliburton is still in the headlines.

Post #59409link

andydougan
July 30, 2002 9:09 PM

I like Dick Cheney. He has an almost Elvisian sneer.

Post #59411link

Spankling
July 30, 2002 9:36 PM

quote:
I like Dick Cheney. He has an almost Elvisian sneer.
Elvis' was a fucked up kid sneer. Dick's is a contemptuous old cyborg-devil sneer.

Post #59414link

ObiJo
July 30, 2002 9:59 PM

YOU ALL FUCKING SUCK COCK!

Except for you, boo. But get your things, we're leaving.

Post #59419link

DexX
July 31, 2002 7:57 AM

Dubyah is an idiot.

Rumsfeld is arrogant.

...but Dick Cheney is evil.

Post #59448link

ObiJo
July 31, 2002 8:46 AM

quote:
Dubyah is an idiot.

Rumsfeld is arrogant.

...but Dick Cheney is evil.


I wouldn't know anything about that.

My comment stood on its own.

Post #59459link

Spankling
July 31, 2002 8:48 PM

quote:
YOU ALL FUCKING SUCK COCK!
YOU\\\'RE GUESSING! YOU CAN\\\'T PROVE A THING!

Who have you been talking to? Did Crabby send you that 8X10 glossy? I can explain that... trick of the light... and the sun was in my eyes...

Post #59503link

Spankling
July 31, 2002 9:14 PM

Post #59506link

Spankling
August 1, 2002 7:24 PM

"For every terrorist plot we discover and every terrorist cell we disrupt, there are dozens of others in the works," Rumsfeld said.

And that is why their methods are doomed to fail. Maybe they should try another approach, like finding out what turns people into extremists that hate the USA. Make those responsible in the government pay for their actions at the same time you punish terrorists. "If your right eye offends thee, pluck it out."

Post #59606link

Spankling
August 5, 2002 8:32 PM

Post #59934link

DexX
August 5, 2002 8:37 PM

Grrrr... can't be fucked signing up for a spam account. Care to paste the relevant bits into this thread?

Post #59935link

Spankling
August 5, 2002 9:05 PM

Embattled Halliburton Unit Gets Bid
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 1:58 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Since Dick Cheney became vice president, a subsidiary of his former company was chosen the exclusive contractor for overseas Army troop support and Navy construction despite being under federal investigation for fraud.

The Navy contract went to the Halliburton Co. subsidiary, Brown & Root Services, despite a recommendation from the auditing arm of Congress that new bids be solicited for the construction contract. That recommendation was ignored.

The Army deal is unusual because its stretches 10 years and has a payment structure that critics say encourages Brown & Root to spend whatever it takes to keep the troops happy.

Halliburton officials say Cheney played no role in the selection of Houston-based Brown & Root for the two contracts, potentially worth billions of dollars over the next decade.

Cheney, a former secretary of defense with experience in Congress and at the White House, headed Halliburton from 1995 until George W. Bush picked him as his running mate in July 2000.

``Cheney steadfastly refused to engage in any activities to sell Halliburton's or its subsidiaries' services to the government during his tenure with the company,'' Halliburton spokeswoman Zelma Branch said.

``Halliburton has made no attempt to ask for his assistance in obtaining federal contracts since he left the company.''

Both Army and Navy contracting officials say they were unaware, when the contracts were awarded, that federal officials in California were investigating allegations that Brown & Root had defrauded the government on another defense contract.

The investigation ended in February when Brown & Root agreed to pay the government $2 million to settle charges it inflated contract prices for maintenance and repairs at Fort Ord, a now-closed military installation near Monterey, Calif.

Even had the Army known about the investigation, officials said, it would not have affected the decision to award the troop support contract to Brown & Root.

``They did not admit to any wrongdoing, and the government did not find them guilty of any wrongdoing, so legally we could not use that,'' said Gale Smith, spokeswoman for the Army Operations and Support Command.

The contract makes Brown & Root the Army's only private supplier of troop support services over the next decade.

There is no ceiling on spending, because the contract is designed to provide rapid troop support wherever and whenever U.S. forces move into action overseas.

Under similar contracts, the Army paid Brown & Root $1.2 billion from 1992 through 1999 to support U.S. troops, mainly in the Balkans. An extension of that contract from 1999 through 2004 is projected to cost $1.8 billion.

``It is close to unprecedented for the government to have given so much of the solution to one contractor,'' said Steven Spooner, a George Washington University professor who specializes in federal contracting.

Spooner said government contracts for services almost never exceed five years, while the Army's deal with Brown & Root is renewable for a decade. He said the contract also is structured so that the more the company spends to support the troops, the more it earns.

``But it's hard to criticize it, because they've convinced the Army from the bottom up that they're taking care of the troops,'' he said. ``To the extent that they are making money hand over fist, they're taking care of the people who have the crappiest job on the planet.''

The Army has paid Brown & Root $13.7 million since the contract began Feb. 1 to provide food, laundry and other support services to U.S. troops in the former Soviet republics of Georgia and Uzbekistan. The Army will not disclose other locations where the contract has been used.

The $300 million, five-year Navy contract was awarded to Brown & Root in April 2001, three months after Cheney became vice president. It followed a November 2000 recommendation from the General Accounting Office that upheld a protest of the original Navy decision in June 2000 to give the Halliburton subsidiary the contract.

The GAO arbitrator questioned the criteria used by the Navy in evaluating the bidders, as well as the Navy's cost analysis, and recommended that new bids be solicited.

Instead, the Navy decided to re-evaluate the original bids ``with requested changes in criteria and the result was the same,'' Navy spokesman John Peters said.

The Navy has given Brown & Root $53 million in work orders in the past 15 months, including $37.3 million to build 816 detention cells at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where terrorist suspects captured in Afghanistan are held.

Both contracts enable the Army and Navy to use Brown & Root for their troop support or construction services, without having to seek out competitive bids from other companies.

Post #59937link

DexX
August 7, 2002 8:08 AM

Dubyah's Scorecard or Evil - every major scummy thing he has done since the start of 2001.

Post #60078link

boorite
August 7, 2002 9:15 AM

The mind reels.

Post #60079link

DexX
August 7, 2002 9:35 AM

This one is my favourite so far:

7-27-2001 - Bush jails a journalist for not revealing her sources.

During the Clinton administration, the Justice Department never--not once--jailed a journalist trying to protect an anonymous source. Attorney General John Ashcroft reverses that policy by jailing Vanessa Leggett when she refuses to turn over notes for a book she's writing about a 1997 murder. What's worse, the proceeding that led to Leggett's incarceration is held in secret, with even the judge's name not released.

(The underlining is mine.)

Post #60080link

fuzzyman
August 7, 2002 9:46 AM

You have the link for that?

Post #60082link

DexX
August 7, 2002 9:53 AM

Dubyah's Scorecard of Evil, above. Find the date and follow the link(s) they provide. Each entry has at least one link to a respectable source, sometimes several.

Post #60083link

mutsje2000
August 7, 2002 11:01 AM

Post #60086link

DexX
August 7, 2002 11:33 AM

quote:
Sometimes Blogs have interesting material, too.
Interesting... it's all stuff I have read before, but seeing it all collected into one article is very interesting.

Post #60090link

mutsje2000
August 7, 2002 11:45 AM

I thought so, too.

I tend to have to rely on blogs for my American-side news, rather than sifting all that crap the nation-centric American news sites put up to find the good stuff. I let the others do the hard work for me... ;)

/benny/

Post #60091link

fuzzyman
August 7, 2002 6:47 PM

I think that I'll be the last person on the net to have a blog. I just can't deal with the concept of putting it all... out there.

Post #60120link

DexX
August 8, 2002 7:21 PM

Post #60250link

Spankling
August 15, 2002 8:46 PM

Camps for Citizens: Ashcroft's Hellish Vision
ttorney general shows himself as a menace to liberty.

By JONATHAN TURLEY, Jonathan Turley is a professor of constitutional law at George Washington University.

Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft's announced desire for camps for U.S. citizens he deems to be "enemy combatants" has moved him from merely being a political embarrassment to being a constitutional menace.

Ashcroft's plan, disclosed last week but little publicized, would allow him to order the indefinite incarceration of U.S. citizens and summarily strip them of their constitutional rights and access to the courts by declaring them enemy combatants.

The proposed camp plan should trigger immediate congressional hearings and reconsideration of Ashcroft's fitness for this important office. Whereas Al Qaeda is a threat to the lives of our citizens, Ashcroft has become a clear and present threat to our liberties.

The camp plan was forged at an optimistic time for Ashcroft's small inner circle, which has been carefully watching two test cases to see whether this vision could become a reality. The cases of Jose Padilla and Yaser Esam Hamdi will determine whether U.S. citizens can be held without charges and subject to the arbitrary and unchecked authority of the government.

Hamdi has been held without charge even though the facts of his case are virtually identical to those in the case of John Walker Lindh. Both Hamdi and Lindh were captured in Afghanistan as foot soldiers in Taliban units. Yet Lindh was given a lawyer and a trial, while Hamdi rots in a floating Navy brig in Norfolk, Va.

This week, the government refused to comply with a federal judge who ordered that he be given the underlying evidence justifying Hamdi's treatment. The Justice Department has insisted that the judge must simply accept its declaration and cannot interfere with the president's absolute authority in "a time of war."

In Padilla's case, Ashcroft initially claimed that the arrest stopped a plan to detonate a radioactive bomb in New York or Washington, D.C. The administration later issued an embarrassing correction that there was no evidence Padilla was on such a mission. What is clear is that Padilla is an American citizen and was arrested in the United States--two facts that should trigger the full application of constitutional rights.

Ashcroft hopes to use his self-made "enemy combatant" stamp for any citizen whom he deems to be part of a wider terrorist conspiracy.

Perhaps because of his discredited claims of preventing radiological terrorism, aides have indicated that a "high-level committee" will recommend which citizens are to be stripped of their constitutional rights and sent to Ashcroft's new camps.

Few would have imagined any attorney general seeking to reestablish such camps for citizens. Of course, Ashcroft is not considering camps on the order of the internment camps used to incarcerate Japanese American citizens in World War II. But he can be credited only with thinking smaller; we have learned from painful experience that unchecked authority, once tasted, easily becomes insatiable.

We are only now getting a full vision of Ashcroft's America. Some of his predecessors dreamed of creating a great society or a nation unfettered by racism. Ashcroft seems to dream of a country secured from itself, neatly contained and controlled by his judgment of loyalty.

For more than 200 years, security and liberty have been viewed as coexistent values. Ashcroft and his aides appear to view this relationship as lineal, where security must precede liberty.

Since the nation will never be entirely safe from terrorism, liberty has become a mere rhetorical justification for increased security.

Ashcroft is a catalyst for constitutional devolution, encouraging citizens to accept autocratic rule as their only way of avoiding massive terrorist attacks.

His greatest problem has been preserving a level of panic and fear that would induce a free people to surrender the rights so dearly won by their ancestors.

In "A Man for All Seasons," Sir Thomas More was confronted by a young lawyer, Will Roper, who sought his daughter's hand. Roper proclaimed that he would cut down every law in England to get after the devil.

More's response seems almost tailored for Ashcroft: "And when the last law was down and the devil turned round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? ... This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast ... and if you cut them down--and you are just the man to do it--do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?"

Every generation has had Ropers and Ashcrofts who view our laws and traditions as mere obstructions rather than protections in times of peril. But before we allow Ashcroft to denude our own constitutional landscape, we must take a stand and have the courage to say, "Enough."

Every generation has its test of principle in which people of good faith can no longer remain silent in the face of authoritarian ambition. If we cannot join together to fight the abomination of American camps, we have already lost what we are defending.

Post #60957link

Spankling
August 15, 2002 8:48 PM

The last long post - I swear!

Scientist's death haunts family
By Fredric N. Tulsky

The death in 1953 of a government scientist, Frank Olson, in a fall from a New York hotel window, is one of the most notorious cases in CIA history.

Only in 1975 did Olson's family learn that the CIA had slipped LSD into his drink, days before his death. President Ford apologized for an experiment gone awry, and promised that the government would reveal everything about the case.

But newly obtained documents show that the Ford administration continued to conceal information about Olson -- particularly his role in some of the CIA's most controversial research of the Cold War, on anthrax and other biological weapons.

The documents show that two of the key officials involved in the decision to withhold that information were White House aides Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, today the nation's vice president and secretary of defense.

``These documents show the lengths to which the government was trying to cover up the truth,'' said the scientist's son, Eric Olson, who gave them to the Mercury News. ``For 22 years there was a coverup. And then, under the guise of revealing everything, there was a new coverup.''

Rumsfeld's office referred questions about the withholding of information to the CIA, where a media officer, Paul Nowack, said CIA activities related to Frank Olson's death were investigated by the Rockefeller Commission as well as subsequent congressional committees.

``The CIA fully cooperated'' in those investigations, he said, and ``tens of thousands of documents were released.'' If anyone has new information, he said, ``they should contact appropriate authorities.''

Eric Olson has contended for years that his father was murdered to cover up his research for the CIA. At a news conference in Maryland today, he will reveal the results of his long inquiry into his father's death.

The new documents do not prove those allegations. But they do show that the White House officials were concerned about any public revelation of Frank Olson's work.

Contrary to the official explanation that Frank Olson was an Army scientist, Olson worked for the CIA, at the special-operations division at Fort Detrick, the Maryland laboratory where biological weapons were tested.

Classified research

Eric Olson said this week that a former colleague and friend of his father's contacted him last year and described some of the closely guarded work his father conducted.

He said the colleague told him his father was among scientists studying the use of LSD and other drugs to enhance interrogations, as Cold War tensions ran high and Americans feared that captured soldiers had been brainwashed in Korea.

In the months before his death, the colleague said, Frank Olson had gone to Europe, where he observed the interrogation of former Nazis and Soviet citizens at a secret U.S. base. And, the colleague said, Frank Olson had knowledge of the U.S. biological weapons program.

Eric Olson contends that in the final days of his life, his father became morally distraught over his work and decided to quit. Personnel records show that agency officials were concerned that he was a security risk. Eric Olson believes that the thought of Frank Olson quitting was a motive for the government to want him dead.

In 1993, Eric Olson arranged for his father's body to be unearthed and examined by a forensic scientist, James Starrs. Starrs concluded that Frank Olson had probably been struck on the head and then thrown out of the hotel window.

Starrs' conclusion is one of the tantalizing pieces that Eric Olson has gathered to support his belief that his father was murdered. Friday, satisfied that he has accomplished what he could, Olson intends to rebury the remains of his father.

In late November 1953, Frank Olson, then 43, joined a group of government officials at a conference at Deep Creek Lodge in western Maryland. For days afterward, Olson was withdrawn. His son, Eric, says his father told his wife that he intended to quit his job.

But Frank Olson did not quit. And on Nov. 23 he went to New York with another government official, where he twice visited Harold A. Abramson, a doctor who was one of the first researchers to study the effects of LSD.

Olson returned to Washington, then went back to New York on Nov. 28 and checked into the Statler Hotel. He was scheduled to enter a sanitarium the next day.

But early in the morning of Nov. 29, Frank Olson went through the window of the hotel room he was sharing with a colleague, Robert Lashbrook. Lashbrook told police that he was awakened by the sound of breaking glass.

The Olson family knew little else. But in 1975, a commission headed by Vice President Nelson Rockefeller issued a report on CIA abuses, and an account in the Washington Post included a mention of an Army scientist who jumped from a New York hotel room days after being slipped LSD in 1953.

``We realized they were talking about my father,'' Eric Olson recalled. Family members talked to reporters about their outrage and said they would sue the government. Days later, the family was invited to the White House to meet President Ford. He assured them that they would be given all information about what happened to Frank Olson.

Soon after, family members were invited to lunch with CIA Director William Colby, who gave them a file of documents that amounted to the CIA investigation into Olson's death. But the documents left many questions unanswered about both his work and the circumstances of his death.

The family was told that a lawsuit was unlikely to succeed. Instead, the administration promised to support a private bill in Congress, through which the family received $750,000 to resolve its claims.

``The express understanding was that the government had promised to give us all information, which clearly meant information about his work relationship with the CIA,'' the Olsons' attorney, David Rudovsky of Philadelphia, said this week. ``It now appears that was not the case.''

Son finds clues

Over the years Eric Olson turned up many clues, real or coincidental. There was, for example, the assassination manual that the CIA declassified in connection with its Guatemala activities. The manual, created in the early 1950s, identified ``the contrived accident'' as ``the most effective technique'' of secret assassination.

``The most efficient accident, in simple assassination, is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface,'' the manual stated.

Only recently Eric Olson obtained files from a University of California-Davis history professor that showed White House officials had intentionally withheld details of Frank Olson's death from the family.

The professor, Kathryn Olmsted, came across the records at the Gerald Ford library. They included a memo from Dick Cheney, a White House assistant at the time, to Donald Rumsfeld, the chief of staff, on July 11, 1975, one day after the Olsons first held a news conference.

The memo warned that a lawsuit could involve ``the possibility that it might be necessary to disclose highly classified national-security information in connection with any court suit or legislative hearings on a private bill.''

The documents also include memos written by White House counsel Roderick Hills to the president that were routed through Cheney and other officials. ``Dr. Olson's job is so sensitive that it is highly unlikely that we would submit relevant evidence'' to a court, Hills wrote, regarding a potential suit by the Olson family.

``If there is a trial, it is apparent that the Olsons' lawyer will seek to explore all of the circumstances of Dr. Olson's employment as well as those concerning his death. Thus, in the trial it may become apparent that we are concealing evidence for national-security reasons and any settlement or judgment reached thereafter could be perceived as money paid to cover up the activities of the CIA.''

As a result, Hills urged settling the case out of court.

Post #60958link

DexX
August 15, 2002 9:43 PM

Bastards, bastards, bastards to a man.

Post #60966link

DragonXero
August 18, 2002 10:39 PM

You're all forgetting the most important fact of Bush's presidency, and why he should stay in office for several terms:
HE HAS HOT DAUGHTERS WHO GET DRUNK OFF THEIR ASSES!

Post #61254link

Spankling
August 19, 2002 8:20 PM

quote:
You're all forgetting the most important fact of Bush's presidency, and why he should stay in office for several terms:
HE HAS HOT DAUGHTERS WHO GET DRUNK OFF THEIR ASSES!
Well.. daughters who get drunk anyway.

Hot?

Not.

Post #61350link

andydougan
August 19, 2002 8:57 PM

Well, they're better than Chelsea. And she didn't even get drunk. She just went to college in foreign countries and then whined about how everyone there was racist against Americans.

Post #61353link

boorite
August 20, 2002 9:42 AM

I think the Bush daughters are hot in that wanton rich slut bimbo kind of way, which does have a certain appeal.

Post #61433link

ObiJo
August 22, 2002 3:15 PM

23361

Having now read your entire collection, I am now authorized to post relevant comics of yours

Post #61738link

boorite
August 23, 2002 9:06 AM

But I made that one in like 5 seconds just to get something into spankles Tom Waits contest. It sucks.

Post #61853link

ObiJo
August 23, 2002 10:26 AM

I will only post your crap comics so as to embarass and humiliate you!

Post #61867link

Spankling
August 24, 2002 3:17 PM

This one REALLY should get more press play. I've seen these stats before, but never on CNN. Everytime Bush talks about war he should be asked where he was when he went AWOL.

Post #62073link

Smarmulus
August 24, 2002 4:56 PM

From the above link provided by Spankling

quote:
As we saw when the president's jet zigzagged across the country in the hours after the attacks, members of the ruling elite are concerned about the safety of all Americans, but somewhat more concerned about their own. This fits, to a startling extent, with their personal histories.

Yes, instead of doing what any leader with a sense of honor or responsiblity would do Bush was hiding so he could change his pants to remove the chicken-shit he shat into them.

You may recall a few weeks later news reports of threatening aircraft near Air Force 1, which were soon revealed to have been false and based on leaks from the government (to see who might believe that garbage.)

Certainly Bush should have shown his face on television and told people to relax, that the situation was being handled. Butt, his lily-white ass was more important obviously. COWARD!

Good news for me personnally - my local NPR radio station announced today they will begin airing BBC world news every weekday morning. I am quite pleased. In the past this program used to be on air, but it has been gone for some time.

I do feel, however, that I am giving myself carpal tunnel syndrome in vain, as I imagine I am preaching to the choir.

Finally, everyone should go to the link provided above by Mr. Spanky and read the article.

TO ALL US CITIZENS: REGISTER TO VOTE AND DO SO! Senate elections are coming up. Let's stop this unprovoked war against Iraq the president wants, but which no one else in the world (including US citizens) wants.

Post #62081link

fuzzyman
August 24, 2002 5:21 PM

From CNN:

In an opinion piece published Friday in The Wall Street Journal Scowcroft, Bush's father's national security adviser, said attacking Iraq now would be a mistake.

Scowcroft warned "an attack on Iraq at this time would seriously jeopardize, if not destroy, the global counter-terrorist campaign we have undertaken." He said if the Iraqis are backed into a corner, they may attempt to use biological or chemical weapons in the hope of starting a war between Israel and the Arab states.

In an opinion piece in The Washington Post, Kissinger, a former secretary of state, said "military intervention should be attempted only if we are willing to sustain such an effort for however long it is needed."

But Bush said that while he will take note of all opinions on the issue, his decision will be made based on other criteria.

"I will use all the latest intelligence-type stuff to make informed decisions about how best to keep the world at peace, how best to defend freedom for the long run, and get back at Sadaam for messin' with my Daddy," he said. "Listen, it's a healthy debate for people to express their opinion. People should be allowed to express their opinion, as long as they agree with John Ashcroft. If you don't agree with John Ashcroft then you're an Enemy Combatant and a non-Christian heathen-type person. Americans need to know I'll be making up my mind based on what Dick Cheney tells me is the bestest way to protect our own country and our friends and allies. Praise Jesus."

Okay, I might have messed with the quote a bit.

Post #62085link

Forum archives » Fights Go Here » Did someone mention politics?

« Prev Page 1 of 74 Next »
stripcreator
Make a comic
Forums
featuring
diesel sweeties
jerkcity
exploding dog
goats
ko fight club
penny arcade
chopping block
also
Brad Sucks