The .png's are just great and I know it took serious work on your part (Brad) to get it all functioning - and believe me I am grateful for the step saving it brings. Here's what I, in an Oliver Twist kinda way was wondering.

How difficult would it be, server wise, bandwidth wise and general coding hassle wise to allow an additional rendering option to a high resolution suitible for print reproduction.

The 72 DPI render is perfect for the web, but doesn't do too well in print format.

A 300 DPI .TIF or .BMP that would hang for 15 minutes and self destruct would allow me to go to print format, a thing I can't do now.

Please advise what the pros and cons of such a thing would be like.

Bob

---
"I intend to live forever -- so far, so good."

Wouldn't that be sort of impossible seeing as though none of the original art is in 300dpi? I don't know that much about printing though.

---
www.bradsucks.net

I can't think of a bigger ink waster.

Bob, just use photoshop or a similar program to change the DPI of your final PNG. It's the same end result - Pixelization.

---
Do you want ants? Because that's how you get ants.