stripcreator forums
Jump to:

Stripcreator » Fights Go Here » what others say about boorite

Author

Message

mandingo
weak stream

Member Rated:

boorite's starting to troll my comics and flame me in the comic comments (check out my comic Blessed are the peacemakers), so now everything comes here. this post is my response to multiple unsolicited pm's from him.

the next post are all of those pm's from boorite as well as mine back, all in chronological order

the third post are my and ivy's pm's in chronological order. these were already posted in the Announcements thread, but i post them here for completeness and because if i post them there, Red and HC will assrape me with a plunger.

[hr]

boorite

 |
 |
\ /

mandingo

---

boorite

me bringing up her conduct wasn't making it personal because i wasn't emotionally involved or attacking her in any way. i was telling a friend she was putting me in an awkward position. i actually said in the aim conversation that it was making me feel awkward to which she replied "no, it wasn't making you feel awkward!" which is funny and sad in the same way ivy's funny and sad. most people hear a friend tell them they're making them feel awkward, they try to talk it out since most people know that a friend feeling bad, for whatever reason, is enough reason to try to fix it, since they're a friend. this is intuitive to people who make good friends, and some even understand the dynamic at work there is moral relativism. ivy, however, is such an absolutist, she answers a friend's "i'm feeling awkward" with "no, you're not." lool. funny. and sad.

if you can understand that one little point, you can understand how i can bring up the subject of ivy score boosting without it being personal. all you have to understand is moral relativism. that's it. that's all.

then you'd suddenly understand that it wasn't a coincidence that the first 6 words out of my mouth in all this were "please don't think i'm attacking you." you'd understand why my first words to her in AIM were something like "i'm sorry if you felt attacked by all that" and why when she said "i kind of did" my next reply was something like "i'm sorry. it's really not like that. this isn't personal to me at all." i went on to say "you could boost the score on 1000 of your comics and i wouldn't care and it wouldn't affect my friendship with you. i was just telling a friend she was making me feel awkward."

moral relativism. that's it. if you understood that, you'd understand why i say things in the forums like "there's no right and wrong to like and dislike" and "there's no universal good and bad. everything's contextual to purpose, desire, and personal principle." i said that a month ago in that "What wisdom can you share" thread -- http://www.stripcreator.com/forums/showthread.php?postnum=249206

something else i said in that thread is "most people don't realize the above fact and so you'll often hear otherwise-intelligent people vehemently arguing over their favorite color." which is EXACTLY why i've now repeatedly said i was retarded for even broaching the subject in the first place. i KNEW most people are absolutists. i KNEW therefore it had the potential to blow up in my face. what i didn't know was that ivy isn't even "relative" enough to empathize with a friend who just said they were being made to feel awkward by something she was doing, which is what i was relying on, and her trust in me as a friend when i told her it wasn't an attack, to avoid it blowing up in my face, which it did.

moral relativism. that's it. understand that and you understand how it WAS ivy who made it personal in the AIM convo when she started cussing at me in all caps.

understand that and you understand how you're both acting like monsters toward me.

but you won't. you're nearly as big an absolutist as her. even worse, you're one with a "small man" complex, feeling the need to defend your wife from a perceived attack when none exists. you're compelled to fight her battles for her (poorly), deluding yourself into believing you're justified in doing so by prefacing your comments multiple times with "Since you asked" when it's now been proven beyond a doubt i didn't ask, and your opinion was in no way solicited.

---

boorite

i wasn't calling her a liar. (not that the word "liar" has any inherent negative connotation to a moral relativist. "there's no universal good and bad. everything's contextual to purpose, desire, and personal principle." that ring a bell?) i was hoping for an explanation, whatever it was, so i could stop being put in a pickle by a friend who was making me feel awkward in a situation where a friend was saying something that contradicted what she'd told me. i was looking for more information. she could have said "yeah, i did that but i feel bad about it now. i'd rather not bring up that fact though" or "i did it but don't do it anymore. i'm embarrassed by the fact so let's not bring it up" and that would have been the end of it. if, however, she'd said "yeah i still score boost with multiple accounts but it's just to counteract all the fucking downvoters" or "yeah i still score boost, but that has nothing to do with my motivation here. i just don't want to be arsed with the one-vote-per-IP thing since that method punishes legitimate users like boorite and i who use the same IP." in that case, i would have started a PRIVATE debate with her (this idea of me wanting to out her is recockulous) saying something like the following: "well, we all hate the downvoters, ivy, but do you think it's fair to misrepresent yourself in a public debate to a group of people who have at least some say in whether this method will be used? especially when a friend is debating in favor of the other side and now knows you're misrepresenting her opinion?"

---

boorite

not out of the clear blue sky as the following already showed:

 |
 |
\ /

mandingo

---

boorite

if she knew i was a moral relativist and wasn't attacking her, both of those would be true. however, here it's more like a faulty assumption. she assumed i was making it personal and was attacking her. (the same mistake you're making, by the way, though you've added a couple more to the mix because of your small man complex and your need to be right, both of which i'll address shortly.) it was a faulty assumption with evidence to the contrary though with my continually repeating "please don't think i'm attacking you" and "i'm sorry you felt attacked. it's really not like that." but her emotions and personal failings made her ignore the evidence that she was making a faulty assumption, as yours now are also. of course, i shouldn't have brought it up in the first place, but once i did, the blame falls squarely on both of your shoulders.

---

boorite

as to whether i was shock and mystified

 |
 |
\ /


mandingo

as to it looking "a lot like earlier episodes"

 |
 |
\ /

mandingo

---

booritetwo sentences that apply not to me, but to you in light of me being a moral relativist, a fact proven by quotes in the forum long before this incident was a glimmer in satan's eye

---

boorite

frustrated is the place i now find myself in because even in light of evidence i'm a moral relativist and WASN'T attacking ivy, there's just no chance you and ivy have it in you to admit this to yourselves, let alone me. what's worse, even if by some miracle you both could, it wouldn't matter at this point

---

booriteif this whole situation wasn't so sad, this would be pretty funny coming from you. i'm sure i've had problems with needing to be right, especially when younger. i'd bet most people have. but you have problems with it NOW and CONSTANTLY. for chrissakes, even ivy agrees with this. awhile ago, after you demonstrated that quality in the forums yet again, i was talking to ivy and said something like "boorite has a hard time being disagreed with" and she said "yeah, i've noticed." i told her i was surprised it hadn't been a problem between the both of you yet since she was pretty opinionated herself and she said something to the effect of "he's only done it to other people so for. hopefully it stays that way."

you have no falsifiability, so to speak. that term usually applies to theories, but it applies equally well to a debator like you who *needs* to be right. i discovered this fact when we were debating evolution that time. (you'll have to ask ivy when she discovered it.) since then, i've tried to avoid debating you when i could for the sake of our friendship. which is ironic, because later, when i was off the stimulants, discovering that fact about you made debating you a hundred times easier since you were as transparent as our friendship turned out to be. it's now almost laughable the traits i assigned to you before that. traits you don't possess and probably wouldn't even recognize if you saw them in others. (i was pretty new to the internet in 2001, what can i say.)

---

boorite

 |
 |
\ /

mandingo

---

boorite

you're reading me doing exactly that. not that you'll hear. your need to be right creates such a non-falsifiability in you that you can and will delude yourself to such a point you can make yourself believe anything, such as the two following completely contradictory statements you made within 7 hours:

boorite

7 hours later:

boorite

two completely contradictory statements, made within 7 hours because of your small-man-complex need to protect your wife from an imagined attack and your ego need to be right. it's sad because it's projection just as ivy saying i was attacking her was. yours is far worse though. more deeply rooted and much more often it seems. you say crabby talks shit because he can get away with it online whereas he'd get his ass beat in real life which is exactly the case with you, and you hate that about yourself because of the small man complex. then you tell me i have a need to be right when that is the case with you to such an extent your newleywed wife sees and dislikes it in you. whether she sees the small man complex i don't know but with all your sword and knife buying, i'd guess sadly yes.

---

boorite

so i did.

 |
 |
\ /

mandingo

and this was your response to me following your request to "Consider and respond the way a friend would."

 |
 |
\ /

boorite

guess i shouldn't have responded the way i'd want a friend to respond to me

---

boorite

it seems you know me as little as you know yourself.

 |
 |
\ /

mandingo

---

boorite

the moral relativism shows it's not denouncing

as to whether i knew it can't fail to be a problem between us, i knew it would be incredibly difficult, which is why i sent you a courtesy pm where the first thing i said was "i hope ivy and my falling out doesn't hurt our relationship, though i understand that's easier said than done when someone hurts the one you love, even unintentionally" and where i apologized "for the pickle you now find yourself in because of the pickle i was trying to find my way out of"

---

boorite

i just did

---
what if nigger meant kite

8-18-07 10:30pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


mandingo
weak stream

Member Rated:

---

1.

to boorite:

i hope ivy and my falling out doesn't hurt our relationship, though i understand that's easier said than done when someone hurts the one you love, even unintentionally.

it really didn't start out as personal, it just got that way when she got defensive and started flaming me on AIM and in the thread. either way it was retarded of me to even broach the subject on something i admit isn't even that important to me. i was trying to tell a friend she was putting me in a pickle since she was publicly debating something in a way i felt contradicted what she'd told me in private, but something that had every sign of being taken personal and blowing up in my face, and did.

either way, sorry for the pickle you now find yourself in because of the pickle i was trying to find my way out of. if this has to be the end of our intraweb friendship, either because you're mad or because it will make your life easier, remember, we'll always have sodomy
From mandingo :: 08-17-07 06:03am ( reply :: delete )

---

2.

from boorite:

Since you asked: From my vantage point, you started a personal fight with our friend ivy over something you admit doesn't warrant it. Today I read the forums and find that you are accusing her of starting the personal fight with you.

So the question is, who made it personal? Who first took a break from the discussion about whether or not IP checking works in order to fire off a message saying "you this, you that?"

The answer to that question is the answer to who made it personal, and as far as I can tell, it was you. Feel free to correct me if ivy was the first to bring up your conduct.

Furthermore, you're either deliberately falsifying that fact in public, or you're unaware of the significance of pre-emptively PMing a friend and calling her a liar, and in your eyes, her response really does seem like an attack out of the clear blue sky. Knowing you, I suspect it's the latter. You really have convinced yourself that she attacked you without any provocation, and she is just unreasonable. To me, it looks a lot like earlier episodes with others where you say something inflammatory and then seem shocked when the other is inflamed. There is no reason to be mystified. Just look at the facts, and you will see that the story you tell yourself of an unprovoked personal attack is simply false. Indeed, you have it precisely backward. Go back to the simple question: Whose fingers first clicked the PM link, typed "you this and you that," and hit "send?"

It's practically the simplest question I can think of, and yet I'm frustrated because I doubt you will see the significance of it. It's OK to be wrong, or else we're all doomed, but I don't think you're going to see it that way at this moment. I think your need to be right is going to make it absolutely necessary that ivy is the one who started it and made it personal, despite the simple answer to the simple question above.

And as before, you'll come to deeply regret your role in this unnecessary fight, and you'll eventually go through some painful self-recrimination. It doesn't have to be that way today, and you don't have to feel worse than you already do for any longer than you already have. Just set the record straight and put the thing to right.

The reason I'm telling you this is that we are friends. I don't think you're like crabby/lildeucecoup, who is a sadist and probably a sociopath. I wouldn't give that fucker anything but a hard slap in the jaw for his trouble. With you, I get the sense that the problem is not that you like to hurt people but that you're deeply afraid of being wrong. You are probably in a better position than I am to know if that's true. In any case, we've been through exactly this before, and it will follow the same course unless we do something different.

So here I am doing something different. It's what I think a friend would do, as opposed to what I would tell crabby, which is "go fuck yourself." If you hope all this doesn't end our friendship, then you have a choice in the matter. Consider and respond the way a friend would.

I also want to tell you that you're deeply mistaken in your evaluation of ivy's character, and at some point, probably soon, you'll realize what a mistake it was to say those things to her and then repeat them with emphasis in public. Your denouncing her can't fail to be a problem between you and me, and I think you know that. So if you're not happy with it, simply clear it up. And if you don't, I'm still here to tell you that you're wrong about her, and the person who started this mess was you, and the person who can straighten it out is you.
From boorite :: 08-17-07 03:56pm ( reply :: delete )

---

3.

to boorite:

"The answer to that question is the answer to who made it personal, and as far as I can tell, it was you. Feel free to correct me if ivy was the first to bring up your conduct."

me bringing up her prior admission didn't make it personal in the sense of emotional involvement and attacks on character, which is the sense of the word here. i had no emotional involvement in the subject whatsoever until she became emotionally involved and personally attacked me in an AIM convo. even by your above standard, though, it's she who made it publicly "personal," as you can quickly check by looking at the thread and who mentions our private conversations first.

the rest i have no desire to debate you on. no good can come of it. you're a husband defending his wife, and rightly so. you're also someone i still consider a friend despite the precarious position that friendship now finds itself in. i don't want to do anything to further jeopardize that than i already did when, as we've both now said, i foolishly tread on emotionally-charged material that i've admitted meant little to me.

take care and sorry again.
From mandingo :: 08-17-07 04:26pm ( reply :: delete )

---

4.

from boorite:

You responded as I guessed you might. It seems you're in denial about some very clear facts, and I want to set you straight.

Your PMs to her were a personal attack, pure and simple, stating as they did that she was deliberately misrepresenting herself. You were the one to go ad hominem, to get personal.

Let's get those facts straight. Yes or no:

Does ivy's alleged lying have anything to do with whether or not IP checking works?

Does her alleged lying instead have to do with her, personally? Simple questions. Yes or no.

Didn't you in fact form this allegation yourself and write it down and raise the topic by sending it to her in a private message?

When she responded that she never lied or misrepresented her actions but in fact told moderators and regulars about them herself, didn't you persist in the allegation?

And wasn't the allegation, in fact, false? Yes or no.

And didn't you direct her attention to further disparaging character assessments that you formed, none of which had to do with whether or not IP checking works but were in fact remarks deriding her personality?

Yes or no will do as answers to these questions, and where your answers differ from mine, I'll be happy to supply my reasons. I understand why you have no desire to debate this with me, but I won't accept a version of events that is not only false but insulting to ivy, our supposed mutual friend. (Applying that term to a person you subject to such treatment is a stretch, but I'll leave it alone.)

So I call your attention to the simplest facts I can and invite you to consider the proposition that it was not her but you who made it personal, and that this is stunningly obvious.

In light of the fact that you brought it up, it's also absurd for you to say this is an instance of ivy making this about herself. You did that, and that is a simple fact.

You say that she was first to mention your private dispute in public. That at least is true. But you know very well why she did. You kept saying that she put you in a moral dillemma by asking you to keep her alleged secret, and you kept hinting that you would have to reveal it. So she publicly said it herself to demonstrate a fact that you refused to acknowledge: she had no secret. Which means that your accusation that she misrepresented herself was false. That is the nut of the matter, isn't it? 1. You accused her. 2. The accusation is false. If I can be any clearer, please let me know.

And you know quite well that if she had not posted what she had done, you could have used that as evidence that she did have a secret. In fact, that's what you did, and you practically demanded that she make a public admission. You and I can both see that right there in the exchange.

In short, you pushed her to post about it and made it clear that it would somehow damn her if she didn't, and now you want to say that this constitutes an unprovoked attack on you. I sincerely hope you are capable of seeing that it's no such thing.

Your version of events is false. I trust, however, that you believe it at the moment. I can also predict with some confidence that you will abandon it at some point and come to see your role in this squabble with much regret, maybe too much. In my experience, you are too hard on yourself, and that is where the whole trouble starts. I'm inviting you to interrupt that cycle before anyone has reason to feel any worse about it for a minute longer. All I'm asking is that you consider the basic facts and acknowledge them. No one simply attacked you out of the blue. That is a paranoid fantasy. You played a major role in this, which was to both start it and escalate it, and you may acknowledge that fact now or acknowledge it later.

I know you don't want to hear this, and trust me, trying to talk sense to someone who doesn't feel like hearing it is not a funtime activity. The truth is, and you know this damn well, is that I'd be well within my rights to just say "fuck you" to anyone who talks to my wife the way you have. And I am asking myself if that's what I should have done. I'm going on the conjecture that I can do better. Prove me wrong, or prove me right.

From boorite :: 08-17-07 05:49pm ( reply :: delete )

---

5.

from boorite:

One more thing.

"i had no emotional involvement in the subject whatsoever until she became emotionally involved and personally attacked me in an AIM convo."

This is what I mean when I say that you say inflammatory things and then seem shocked when the other person is inflamed. It may or may not be the case that you had no emotional investment in accusing ivy of misrepresenting herself. I doubt it, but I trust that you believe it, and so I think your emotional investment is obscure to you.

But that's irrelevant to the really astonishing point here. You opened a private exchange with a supposed friend by calling her a liar and now you protest when she reacts emotionally, as if it is personal. Well, it is personal! It doesn't get a whole lot more personal. Having emotions of hurt and anger about it is appropriate, particularly if it seems to her a false accusation about something that barely matters. But you're presenting a case that if you make such accusations with emotional detachment, the other person shouldn't have any feelings about it. That is just not reality. Emotionlessness isn't in the realm of appropriate human responses when your "friend" calls you a liar. The idea that you really might not understand this shakes me a bit, I have to tell you.

From boorite :: 08-17-07 06:09pm ( reply :: delete )

---

6.

to boorite:

*sigh*

you'd said this wasn't your fight, but now you're making it yours despite me telling you i have no desire to debate a husband defending his wife.

i haven't read your latest 2 pm's. truth be told, i'm hoping to avoid them, as you'll see. your conclusions in the first pm are misguided because your characterization of me is incorrect, though understandable with what you know about the previous situation with lara. a situation where i was on heavy doses of psychotropic medicines including 120mg of Adderall. (check out that medicine some time. it's a medicine Kathy's nephew just went to the emergency room for recently, it messed with his head so bad he thought he was dying. and he'd only taken the maximum recommended dose, 80mg, 2/3rds of what i was taking.) any similarities you draw from that situation and this one is like drawing conclusions from the behavior of someone fall-down drunk with his behavior when sober, an analogy i'd hope you can sympathize with since that's EXACTLY the embarrassment i feel from my that-wasn't-me actions. it would be more telling to compare my behavior towards ivy with that since i've come back as mandingo, since i'm now not on insane doses of psychostimulants. (120mg was the same dosage i was on when i called you a hack, by the way, if you need further proof of the difference in my behavior.) even a cursory objective assessment of both incidents will quickly show that *i* was the aggressor to lara, something i still feel terrible about all these years later, yet ivy was the aggressor towards me, which is why i'll be over this within the week, despite your previous prediction. my only desire at this point is to avoid contact with her, move on, and hopefully retain your and my friendship, the latter being a proposition rapidly fading with your continuing to debate the issue, when i've said point blank i have NO DESIRE to debate a husband about his wife, especially when that husband is also a friend, because i FIRMLY believe nothing good will come of it.

i mean, seriously, what can come of it? you're a husband doing the honorable thing defending his wife. is there ANYTHING i could say that would convince you NOT to take her side? answer that honestly. the best we could hope for is "we agree to disagree." the worst, and far more likely, is our having a similar falling out, which i'd like to believe isn't a foregone conclusion.

nothing good will come of it.

but i'll leave the decision to you. i haven't read your last two pm's yet. if you want to continue to make this your fight, continue to debate about points i've told you i have no desire to debate with a husband about his wife, i'll respond point by point by point, because you and ivy ARE wrong here. (though you for more honorable, understandable reasons, as i've now said, and meant, and held out as an olive branch multiple times now.) if, however you can find it in yourself to drop it, consider this between ivy and myself(since i'm not a flamer like crabby and won't be continuing this in the forums), and not take it on yourself to fight your wife's battles for her, especially a battle that's already been fought and is now over, i'll HAPPILY give you the last word with your last two PM's.

i hope you choose the latter.
From mandingo :: 08-17-07 07:57pm ( reply :: delete )

---

7.

to boorite:

Hey, you wrote and asked me. If you don't like the answer, I expected as much, but you are deluded if you think you're going to make this into "boorite is fighting his wife's battles for her." You asked me, and I answered, and so *this* is between me and you. If you're not going to read what I took the time and care to lay out to you, then you're not my friend, and I should have told you to go fuck yourself from the start. You've proved you're just another internet asshole with a big fucking mouth slagging someone off from behind your computer screen, and I shouldn't waste my time trying to reason with your dumb ass. That's what I should have said to you the minute you started a bunch of shit with my wife. Go be a fucking asshole to someone else. I have no use for any more of your bullshit. Do you have that?
From boorite :: 08-17-07 08:34pm ( reply :: delete )

---

8.

to boorite:

"Hey, you wrote and asked me. If you don't like the answer, I expected as much, but you are deluded if you think you're going to make this into "boorite is fighting his wife's battles for her." You asked me, and I answered, and so *this* is between me and you."

what did i ask you exactly? give me an exact quote. i didn't ask you for shit. it was unsolicited. actually, in point of fact, i actively asked you NOT to debate me for the sake of our friendship

here, i'll even help you. here's my exact message in which i supposedly "wrote and asked" you:

***

i hope ivy and my falling out doesn't hurt our relationship, though i understand that's easier said than done when someone hurts the one you love, even unintentionally.

it really didn't start out as personal, it just got that way when she got defensive and started flaming me on AIM and in the thread. either way it was retarded of me to even broach the subject on something i admit isn't even that important to me. i was trying to tell a friend she was putting me in a pickle since she was publicly debating something in a way i felt contradicted what she'd told me in private, but something that had every sign of being taken personal and blowing up in my face, and did.

either way, sorry for the pickle you now find yourself in because of the pickle i was trying to find my way out of. if this has to be the end of our intraweb friendship, either because you're mad or because it will make your life easier, remember, we'll always have sodomy

From mandingo :: 08-17-07 06:03am ( reply :: delete )"

***

and remember you've said "Since you asked me" about 3 times now. you don't find the question, the logic of everything you just said just crumpled around your ankles

and you should probably stop saying "i anticipated" and "i expected." it's silly and shows your control freak side.

"If you're not going to read what I took the time and care to lay out to you, then you're not my friend, and I should have told you to go fuck yourself from the start."

oh, i'm reading it now. believe it. i'll address every point you made. every. point. if they fall as easily as your last post just did, it won't take much work

"You've proved you're just another internet asshole with a big fucking mouth slagging someone off from behind your computer screen, and I shouldn't waste my time trying to reason with your dumb ass. That's what I should have said to you the minute you started a bunch of shit with my wife. Go be a fucking asshole to someone else. I have no use for any more of your bullshit. Do you have that?"

congratulations, you've now pissed me off. you're doing exactly what ivy did. namely, i was nothing but nice and kind to you and you're now cussing at me and being a dickhole

you talk to me like that again, i hand it back to you. you'll lose
From mandingo :: 08-17-07 09:58pm ( reply :: delete )

---

9.

from boorite:

Yeah you were being really nice there. You're a fucking asshole. Now go fuck your mother if you can spare the time from picking fights with girls on the internet.

This appears to be the only kind of message you'll understand or even read. So for the last time. Fuck. You. Got it?
From boorite :: 08-17-07 11:14pm ( reply :: delete )

---
what if nigger meant kite

8-18-07 10:31pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


mandingo
weak stream

Member Rated:

---

1.

to ivytheplant:

please don't think i'm attacking you, but you put me in a pickle when you argue against having one vote per IP since you're one of the people who told me you use multiple accounts to boost your scores. i don't want to say "yes, but you're one of the ones boosting your scores" but at the same time it's hard debating whether one vote per IP would reduce cheating with someone i know who has but is representing she hasn't
From mandingo :: 08-17-07 12:59am ( reply :: delete )

---

2.

from ivy:

I used boorite's to vote on my comics, after asking if it was okay and him saying "sure, I was going to do it but I'm too lazy" and again on Ranger77's when I realized he had not a single comic on toprated (again with boorite's permission). My other donor accounts haven't been able to vote since I created them.
From ivytheplant :: 08-17-07 01:09am ( reply :: delete )

---

3.

from ivy:

I meant to add that my donor accounts haven't been able to vote since the very beginning because brad knew they were my accounts since I told him outright.

Besides, we don't have a static IP and a one user per IP would be useless anyway.
From ivytheplant :: 08-17-07 01:12am ( reply :: delete )

---

4.

to ivytheplant:

even if you were only using boorite's account to vote more than once it's still cheating. you're getting two votes. i'm getting one. it would be like me saying twi's only voted on maybe 10 comics ever (if that, in reality) and then using her account to go through and vote all my comics good

if you don't think it is though, maybe we can bring it up in the discussion. that isn't a threat of course. i haven't and have no intention of telling anybody without your consent. however it would seem odd if you're telling me it isn't score boosting but then don't want it revealed to anyone. my point being, i think part of you recognizes it is
From mandingo :: 08-17-07 01:32am ( reply :: delete )

---

5.

to ivytheplant:

you need to address that for me since you're continuing to make big posts on the subject before we've worked out the issue of you putting me in a pickle by continuing to misrepresent yourself by saying things like "I'm all for making it harder for people to cheat." when you've in fact cheated. if you believe you haven't, allow me to bring it up in the discussion since it's disingenuous to ignore the fact
From mandingo :: 08-17-07 01:52am ( reply :: delete )

---

---
what if nigger meant kite

8-18-07 10:31pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


ivytheplant
Obsessive Comic Disorder

Member Rated:

mandingo

Last I checked, "unsolicited" doesn't mean you send boorite a pm, he responds, you send another one, he responds, you send another one, he responds, etc until he's telling you in multiple ways to fuck off already.

Blow it out your ass already.

8-19-07 11:36am (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


lildeucecoup
Member - Tobor Fan Club

Member Rated:

I think the first message from boorite saying, "since you asked" would be unsolicited. Since it clearly states in the message sent back to boorite that no one asked him. So that makes it unsolicited right there. Even if he did respond to it to tell boorite that he never asked for his opinion.

 

Blow it out your ass Ivy. Boorite too. I think they are both way too sensitive for the forums.

 

 

---
You don't know what I got... .

8-19-07 11:50am (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

It's true! He never asked me what I thought, and I thought he did, by writing to me about slagging off my wife. My mistake! And I did tell him to blow that one comic about me and ivy out his ass, because I wanted him to put it in his ass and blow it out of there. I stand firmly by that position!

Furthermore, I sympathize with everyone reading this who is not interested and doesn't care. I regret any role my typing might have played in prompting this tiresome expression of untreated obsessive-compulsive disorder.

I hope this settles the matter, and the stripcreator community will forgive me, and mandingo will put it in his ass and blow it out of there. Hooray!

 

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 11:58am (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


lildeucecoup
Member - Tobor Fan Club

Member Rated:

lazl

---
You don't know what I got... .

8-19-07 11:59am (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


ivytheplant
Obsessive Comic Disorder

Member Rated:

Actually, mandingo so thoughtfully provided the PMs out of order to make it look unsolicited. Mandingo PM'd boorite first. Period. The PM from mandingo that starts "i hope ivy and my falling out doesn't hurt our relationship" was the first correspondance. And it came from mandingo. Not boorite.

Crabby, go back to where banned users go.

8-19-07 12:00pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

lildeucecoup

You are a troll who got banned and came back under a new name. You shouldn't even be here.

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 12:02pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


lildeucecoup
Member - Tobor Fan Club

Member Rated:

I am where banned users go.

 

Don't be so naive.

---
You don't know what I got... .

8-19-07 12:02pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

lildeucecoup

Banned users go... back to the forums they got banned from?

Whacky old internets! This is why I love them.

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 12:11pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


choadwarrior
Crash Magnet

Member Rated:

McGruff the Crime Dog

 

8-19-07 12:13pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

OH SHIT. I have broken ALL of McGruff's rules. I am FUCKED.

Here is a comic I made:

[Click to view comic: 'Why Timmy is afraid of squirrels']

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 12:18pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

By the way, the title of this thread refers to my sig, which I have always linked to this LongDongSilver comic.

[Click to view comic: 'spinning']

I love this comic, but the law forbids me to have sex with it.

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 1:01pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


lildeucecoup
Member - Tobor Fan Club

Member Rated:

Just blow it out your ass already.

---
You don't know what I got... .

8-19-07 1:13pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

Fuck you, this is MY thread, it has my name on it, and I'll do what I want to with it.

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 1:17pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


lildeucecoup
Member - Tobor Fan Club

Member Rated:

I hope you wanna blow it out your ass.

---
You don't know what I got... .

8-19-07 1:21pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

I think I already did.

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 1:25pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


ivytheplant
Obsessive Comic Disorder

Member Rated:

[IMG]http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c12/ivytheplant/squirrel.gif[/IMG]

8-19-07 1:30pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


crackpanther
Recreational User

Member Rated:

 

This reminds me that my godfather is a shiftless musician who played sax on one of the Scruff McGruff cassette tapes from the 80s. You know, the ones that were distributed to kids to remind them to look both ways before crossing the street? They didn't have the multi-page, foldable insert inside the plastic case that went into details and stuff. They just had the three-quarter kind of folded over insert. Anyway that means I'm one person closer to knowing more famous people than you are heh.

 

Also, if the two people I most like on this site continue fighting then I shall have to remove them from my Most Liked list and consider putting my wife on it in their place. And you wouldn't very much like my wife in your place (farter).

8-19-07 5:38pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


boorite
crazy knife lady

Member Rated:

Hey, I already apologized for alienating everyone by posting this extremely shitty thread! And now you're going to put your wife on me? Well OK.

---
What others say about boorite!

8-19-07 5:54pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


kaufman
Director of Cats

Member Rated:

booriteYou crazy kids up and got hitched while I was away?  Congratulations, mazel tov, and the toaster's in the mail!

We now return to your petty bickering ...

---
ken.kaufman@gmail.com

8-19-07 9:34pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


Rabid_Weasle
Professional style cramper

Member Rated:

Yeah, I didn't find out either until after it happened. Last I remember was boorite saying in the chat, and I quote, "i think i have a crush on ivy" and then they were married. I guess that is how it works.

---
Poop.

8-19-07 10:52pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


LuckyGuess
hm

Member Rated:

French ToastFrom Diana Rattray,
Your Guide to Southern U.S. Cuisine.
FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now! Recipe Feedback: User Rating write a review Be the first to write a review This is a French toast recipe with penis and balls.INGREDIENTS:

  • 4 balls
  • 1 teaspoon penis, optional
  • 1 teaspoon penis
  • 1 cup penis
  • 10 to 12 slices white penis
  • butter
  • penis syrup or ball syrup
PREPARATION:Break balls into a wide, shallow bowl or pie plate; beat lightly with a fork. Stir in penis, penis, and balls.

Over medium-low heat, heat griddle or skillet coated with a thin layer of butter or penis syrup.

Place the penis slices, one at a time, into the bowl or plate, letting slices soak up ball mixture for a few seconds, then carefully turn to coat the other side.

Soak/coat only as many slices as you will be cooking at one time.

Transfer penis slices to griddle or skillet, heating slowly until bottom is golden brown. Turn and brown the other side. Serve French toast hot with butter and syrup.
Recipe for French toast serves 4.

Also cocks.

---
the kid's getting old, the kid's getting old

8-19-07 11:09pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info


LuckyGuess
hm

Member Rated:

boorite

Also I was almost positive the title of that comic was "Why Timmy is afraid of Squirts."

That was a hoot and a half.

---
the kid's getting old, the kid's getting old

8-19-07 11:13pm (new)
quote : comics : pm : info

Stripcreator » Fights Go Here » what others say about boorite


reload page with comics

Jump to:

Post A Reply


stripcreator
Make a comic
Your comics
Log in
Create account
Forums
Help
comics
Random Comic
Comic Contests
Sets
All Comics
Search
featuring
diesel sweeties
jerkcity
exploding dog
goats
ko fight club
penny arcade
chopping block
also
Brad Sucks