Start showing me these transparently moronic comments so we can establish a general consensus of what constitutes idiocy. I think in the context of these discussions, it may be important that all sides of these issues establish such boundaries to effectively keep the discussion on track.
As for boorite, why would anyone attack him because of what I have said or felt? That seems pretty petty and pedantic. Clark and Dean are members of the same party with a general commonality in political opinion. If Dean screams, do we laugh at Clark?
I have said that generally boorite represents how I feel politically. No one can attest to any such instance where boorite has said the same for me. We settled on that? Boorite is not my leader, my lion-tamer, nor is he my keeper. He makes sense, even to you thick-headed sons of bitches, so you try to slag his arguments and attempt to invalidate them by telling him he has to reign me in? A good, hearty WTF is appropriate here.
And boorite, I always give everyone, including MaKK, you, and everyone else, the courtesy of reading their posts, so at least I can respond using all the data available in this argument. I have to say I am slightly insulted by your inability to do the same for me. There is no need to defend yourself, I am sure you have tons of reasons why you have deemed it appropriate to pay my arguments little attention, and I can respect any of them. I respect your opinions, and have since I got here, so needless to say it disheartens me a tad.
---
The giant three-phallused phallus of Uzbekistan will one day squirt the cosmic jizz of revenge all over Canada.