rabid's starting to troll my comics and flame me in the comic comments (check out my comic Ivy's greatest wish and worst nightmare in one panel), so now everything comes here. this post is my response to multiple unsolicited pm's from him.
the next post are all of those pm's from rabid as well as mine back, all in chronological order
the other post are my and chicka's pm's in chronological order. these were already posted in the Announcements thread, but i post them here for completeness and because if i post them there, ivy and mandingo will assrape me with a plunger.
[hr]
Rabid_Weasle
|
|
\ /
redfeather
---
Rabid_Weasle
Then chicka the cockcunt chimed in, or didn’t. it doesn’t matter
---
redfeather
i wasn't calling her a whore. (not that the word "whore" has any inherent negative connotation to a moral relativist. "there's no universal good and bad. everything's contextual to purpose, desire, and personal principle." that ring a bell?) i was hoping for an explanation, whatever it was, so i could stop being put in a pickle by a friend who was making me feel awkward in a situation where a friend was saying something that contradicted what she'd told me. i was looking for more information. she could have said "yeah, i did that but i feel bad about eating the pop tart now. i'd rather not bring up that fact though" or "i did it but don't do it anymore. i'm embarrassed by the fact so let's not bring it up" and that would have been the end of it. if, however, she'd said "yeah i still eat pop tarts but it's just to counteract you" or "yeah i still eat a tart, but that has nothing to do with my motivation here.
---
Rabid_Weasle
not out of the clear blue sky as the following already showed:
|
|
\ /
attitudechicka
---
Rabid_Weasle
if they knew i was a moral relativist and wasn't attacking her, both of those would be true. however, here it's more like a faulty assumption. she assumed i was making it personal and was attacking her. (the same mistake you're making, by the way, though you've added a couple more to the mix because of your small man complex and your need to be right, both of which i'll address shortly.) it was a faulty assumption with evidence to the contrary though with my continually repeating "please don't think i'm attacking you" and "i'm sorry you felt attacked. it's really not like that." but her emotions and personal failings made her ignore the evidence that she was making a faulty assumption, as yours now are also. of course, i shouldn't have brought it up in the first place, but once i did, the blame falls squarely on both of your shoulders.
---
redfeather
the they stared fighting each other
|
|
\ /
attitudechicka
But what is this about?
Rabid_Weasle
Rabid_Weasle
And then went back to me
Rabid_Weasle
---
rabid_weasle
attitudechicka
---
|
|
\ /
RedfeatheR
---
frustrated is the place i now find myself in because even in light of evidence i'm a moral relativist and WASN'T attacking chicka, there's just no chance you and ivy have it in you to admit this to yourselves, let alone me. what's worse, even if by some miracle you both could, it wouldn't matter at this point
---
Rabid_Weasle
if this whole situation wasn't so sad, this would be pretty funny coming from you. i'm sure i've had problems with needing to be right, especially when younger. i'd bet most people have. but you have problems with it NOW and CONSTANTLY. for chrissakes, even chicka agrees with this. awhile ago, after you demonstrated that quality in the forums yet again, i was talking to ivy and said something like "rabid has a hard time being disagreed with" and she said "yeah, i've noticed." i told her i was surprised it hadn't been a problem between the both of you yet since she was pretty opinionated herself and she said something to the effect of "he's only done it to other people so for. hopefully it stays that way."
you have no falsifiability, so to speak. that term usually applies to theories, but it applies equally well to a debator like you who *needs* to be right. i discovered this fact when we were debating evolution that time. (you'll have to ask ivy when she discovered it.) since then, i've tried to avoid debating you when i could for the sake of our friendship. which is ironic, because later, when i was off the stimulants, discovering that fact about you made debating you a hundred times easier since you were as transparent as our friendship turned out to be. it's now almost laughable the traits i assigned to you before that. traits you don't possess and probably wouldn't even recognize if you saw them in others. (i was pretty new to the internet in 2004, what can i say.)
I just wanted a goddamn pop tart
