That in itself is pretty funny. Hopefully you don't get both of them confused with Bad English. Or, holy shit, Color Me Badd.

Maybe I should do my next comparison about Bad English and Damn Yankees -- the "British" vs American supergroups of the late 1980s! (the only Brit in BE was singer John Waite).

I suppose it was more of a friendly rivalry since several of the guys from both groups played together in other bands at one time or another, but that doesn't sell ad space (wait, our website don't have any ad space...or ads!).

---
Chicken Feather Bed Bugs Bunny Hop Sing Out Side Street Walker Texas Ranger Cookie Dough Boy Wonder Years

Thanks. I obviously lean towards their later catalog for my picks, but She Loves You is joyous, and much of their early work is pure energy. My Mom had several of their singles, so those were my introduction to the Fab Four.

---
Chicken Feather Bed Bugs Bunny Hop Sing Out Side Street Walker Texas Ranger Cookie Dough Boy Wonder Years

Yes to the first, no to the second, although I might get Color Me Badd confused with Another Bad Creation.

I just looked it up and Color Me Badd are still on tour!  This year!  Possibly coming to a city near you!

Brutal, but hilarious.

Yeah, this gets me every time too.  You know, between this and the Police's "Every Breath You Take" (which my friends and I refer to as "the stalker song"), you've got the start of a whole mixtape about abusive relationships.

I'm a late-Beatles kind of guy myself, but really, you can hardly go wrong with any of their stuff.  Interesting tidbit, though: you know the end of She's So Heavy when they stop singing and just repeat the same few bass notes for a while?  Well, when I was growing up we had that album on vinyl.  And the record had a scratch in it.  Right there.  So that bass just looped on and on forever.  So yeah, not my favorite Beatles song.

By the way, here's some free web design advice: make the font on the site bigger.  First, it'll be easier to read against the busy background (although reducing the opacity of the background images was a good move too).  Second, research tells us that once the number of words per line gets above a certain point, it's more work for people to read.  I don't remember what the cutoff is but you're definitely above it, at least on my monitor.  I'll spare you the full-blown course on CSS, but enlarging the font is a low-hanging fruit that will help alleviate both of those problems.

---
The what mentioned above is total fiction. Please don't take it seriously!

Never thought about that. The other guy handles the web stuff, so I'll suggest increasing the font.

And you mean words per line as far as the text being stretched out across the page? Yeah, I get that. Might be worth making a change in that direction. I'll bring it up at the next meeting.

But, yes, I have tried to make the backgrounds as light as possible while still being visible. Some are more obtrusive than others, but that's our style. Also, my buddy happens to be against links to videos and such, so that's why we don't have those (even though I've wanted to include some).

Thanks for the advice. When we put up anything new, I'll post here.

---
Chicken Feather Bed Bugs Bunny Hop Sing Out Side Street Walker Texas Ranger Cookie Dough Boy Wonder Years