Theoretically, this is already true. It just makes it look like you've voted while not logged in, but silently discards your vote. At least, it was that way at one point.
At one time, this was also true. My www.lowpass.net cookie has a long string in it which, according to Johnny, is my comic voting history. However, my www.stripcreator.com cookie does not have the same thing, so I guess he took that feature away. Ironically, if he did, I suspect it was to encourage voting. One of the reasons I stopped voting was because there were so many good comics that I had already voted on.
quote:
You may vote on any comic you surf up, even if you're looking at someone's personal collection.
You may not vote on your own comics.
As you point out, these would probably encourage cheating.
My opinion is still that the reason voting is a crock is because scores are cumulative, rather than averages. Notice how many of the top scoring strips are from January or February, when there were only a few thousand or so comics total. Now there are 20,000. A comic that has been getting ones since January is still going to be a lot higher than one that was created last week and is getting tens. Especially since, the fewer comics there are, the more often they come up for voting.
Believe it or not... I don't think any comic on this site has scored more than 100 points. If that. Any old-timers or people who experimented with stuffing the ballot are welcome to comment on that estimate. But if it's accurate, that should give you some idea of the state of the voting process.
Johnny is apparently very busy lately, and I don't expect him to make any changes in the near future, whether he likes the ideas or not. That's not a jab at him, just a fact. I know how it is to be that busy.
What keeps me coming back are the Comic Contests and the other stuff we post on the message boards. As far as I'm concerned, that's where the real action is. I vote sometimes when I'm bored, and I give out 10s to anything I think is good, just to help it rise above the crap.
As for the racist claptrap, the reason it stays at the bottom of the pile is because, if I'm not mistaken, at the time those comics were created, it was possible both to vote for arbitrary comics, and to give them negative scores (the scale was -5 to +5 instead of 1 to 10). I didn't find this place until late January, so I might have the story wrong. But I'm pretty sure that anything on the low end of the sort-by-score list that's from January is down there because it still has a negative score.
And as for not being able to see scores, that's because there was too much cheating when you could. I guess now that people have only a vague idea of how much others think their work sucks, there's less motivation to cheat.
And I agree with DexX about needing a FAQ.
---
The what mentioned above is total fiction. Please don't take it seriously!