blah blah blah blah blah.

MaKK loves to lay on the Republican welcome mat while Reagan shits out little Ollie North links onto his tits, and George W. and his poppa take turns dipping their assholes on his nose. Plus, Rush Limbaugh is busy fucking the shit out of one of the pores on MaKK's ass with his micro-cock. And Barbara Bush is munching on the Ollie North shit sausages.

---
The giant three-phallused phallus of Uzbekistan will one day squirt the cosmic jizz of revenge all over Canada.

I don't really think it's a partisan issue as to whether or not we should give in to al-Qaeda's demands. I think if any president, Republican or Democrat, said we should do such a thing they'd be ruined in politics forever. Kerry's only chance on this issue is to take a cue from Kennedy versus Nixon and try to run farther right than Bush on the war on terror.

I don't see how you tie me not wanting to give in to al-Qaeda with a Republican agenda, I think that's across the board not even considered, and why I thought boorite must have been joking. I guess given his response he wasn't. I'm still not sure why this pushed his buttons when nothing else did. Was I not supposed to take that idea seriously? I guess if it looked like I was missing the joke on purpose that could be irritating, but he sounded pretty serious.

In case my point wasn't clear, I completely and totally disagree with the idea of either caving in to al-Qaeda's demands or giving up on hunting them down. We had a hands-off approach for a long time and it only encouraged them. When their "potential base" consists of religious fanatics wanting to oppress women and kill jews, I really don't care about working to appease them either, nor do I think we could do anything that would change their mind about the U.S. just by leaving them alone. Their religious leaders are still going to pass the buck to us anyway.

If you tell me what I'm doing that makes you mad, I'll stop, unless it's just me disagreeing. If you're getting that mad because I disagree maybe you should double-check what forum you're in (or what country you're in).

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

I'm not sure who you're arguing with, Makk. What you're disagreeing with scarcely resembles anything I've said. Oh, wait, that's what a troll does to bother people and drag the thread out indefinitely.

I'm slow learner, but I think I got this one finally.

---
What others say about boorite!

Ok, well that doesn't change my opinion. Are there parts of that you disagree with? The biggest problem I have is with putting anything we do in the Middle East in the context of "giving in to al-Qaeda". If we do something to change our policies, it should be because it's the right thing. Linking it to appeasing al-Qaeda or potential al-Qaeda fighters shouldn't be an option. You're right, sometimes we do secretly negotiate with terrorists, but it remains public policy to not negotiate with terrorists for very good reasons.

I do take issue with the insinuation that our policies justify the behavior of al-Qaeda, which, if you didn't mean, you certainly suggest.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Never suggested it, never meant it. Have said much the opposite.

3-day weekend time. Happy Memorial Day.

---
What others say about boorite!

I think when you lodge an attack BEFORE you give demands it's obvious you just want to cause damage and chaos. I think any "demands" are just lip service, and were hastily made up and later refined after the attention al-Qaeda got following 9-11.

Here you certainly suggest our peacekeeping presence is partly to blame for something. What is it to blame for? If that's not the case, what harm are we doing?

You certainly don't paint a glowing picture of the U.S. here. So we're not giving out aid, advancing other nations' economies, and not keeping the peace? All in all I think we do much more good than harm, and our "presence" provides a lot of economic growth.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

All over the country the more enlightened republicans are bailing on Bush. mak? No. He just doesn't get it.

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

Nice sources on that factoid. But my last post was completely about al-Qaeda.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Who pays attention to what you say?

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

You just did to ask that question! SCORE!

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

By the way, if you want your goat back it's gonna cost.

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

I say we get all the world leaders stoned, then sit them down to watch The Day After Tomorrow.

---
Do you want ants? Because that's how you get ants.

There was a TV movie about a small town's struggle after a nuclear war that supposedly changed Reagan's thoughts on the possibilities of winning a limited nuclear engagement. The science on The Day After Tomorrow just looks too bad for me to think about stomaching though, unless some world leaders have a Freeze Ray in the works.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

That After a Couple a Days movie needs more sodomy. And science. But we can hope it makes people talk about ecological problems for real.

On another note...
Cheney Office 'Coordinated' Halliburton Deal -Time

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

At least this Vice President sells out to American industry instead of Chinese facism.

By the way, Bush is just plain laughing at you because of this:

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Two wrongs don't make a right.

You also might want to ask the families of the 800+ troops who have died in the name of Halliburton profits whether it was worth it.

---
Think classy, you'll be classy.

Just because one thing follows another doesn't mean it caused the first event. Halliburton profitting from the war doesn't mean Halliburton started the war.

And I didn't say anything was wrong with choosing to benefit an American company over a hostile Chinese government.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

That is just flat out ranting.

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

So you don't see anything fishy about the VP's former company getting the biggest contract in Iraq? A company that overcharged for services as well? Of course you wouldn't even THINK to entertain the notion that maybe our fearless leaders invaded Iraq to line their pockets.

Ahh. So just because it's an AMERICAN company and not a "hostile Chinese government", that makes it a-ok. Gotcha.

Earlier, you said you'd entertain the idea of having a discussion. There's just no way I could have a "discussion" with someone who's priorities are so far out of whack.

So when are we invading China, since they're so hostile? I hope it's soon, cause there'll be nothing but reruns on TV this summer, and I'll need stimulating and quality programming for my lazy American couch potato ass.

---
Think classy, you'll be classy.

I thought they were already rich. I think having someone who worked for one of the few companies that's had some experience in nation building is important at a time like this, you're right about that.

I suppose looking at the actual facts would be silly:

Yes?

I need more evidence to vilify Halliburton than the fact that Cheney worked for it.

China is openly hostile to Taiwan, this is a fact. It is openly hostile towards religions it does not approve of in its own borders. This is also a fact. Yeah, I'm not thrilled that our last administration was in their back pockets.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

From the link Makk posted above:

Like Cheney is going to admit to any wrong-doing. Give me a break.

The fact that he is still on the payroll says it all.

Makk, I truly hope you aren't that naive to just dismiss any thought that maybe there are some under-the-table dealings still going on between Cheney and his "former" employer.

Damn those nasty Democrats for making me bring shit up from 4 years ago! Don't make me start talking about Lewinsky again!

---
Think classy, you'll be classy.

Don't expect Makk to put two and two together here, niteowl. It's too obvious to fit into Makkian anti-logic.

Makk, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

*laughs*

---
...Trot and Cap'n Bill were free from anxiety and care. Button-Bright never worried about anything. The Scarecrow, not being able to sleep, looked out of the window and tried to count the stars.

It's taking far too many pages for everyone to realize MaKK is just a sensationalist troll. I wonder if the reason he never WATCHES Fox News is because he writes for it?

---
The giant three-phallused phallus of Uzbekistan will one day squirt the cosmic jizz of revenge all over Canada.

I was just responding to your suggestion that Halliburton somehow "planned" the war. I still think the burden of proof is on you to show how Cheney is benefitting from this.

And do you have any idea exactly how many other U.S. companies there are that could handle rebuilding Iraq?

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

It's been done. Pay attention.

Why US?

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet