Okay, I'm a big, ugly American who thinks that soccer is for kids and proles. I believe my problem is that I'm used to seeing substandard American soccer. Why?
Well, the other day I watched almost the entire match between Man U. and FC Porto. It was excellent. The action hardly stopped, and the battle was quite tense. Still, I have a couple of questions about the game if someone could help me out.
Man U. went up 1-nil in the first period (forgive my ignorance of football lingo from here on out). They seemed to be always on the attack and looked like the more talented team. However, in the second half, FC Porto played the aggressor, and Man U. looked mostly washed out. Porto scored a goal to tie the game, but they advanced to some sort of playoffs because of a strange scoring system concerning home vs. away goals. Also, Man U. had a goal disallowed after an "offsides" call. After one of the announcers explained the offsides rule, it was pretty apparent that the goal should have counted (unless he was biased toward Man U.) Anyway, here are my questions...
1) Why didn't Man U. keep attacking in the second half? Were they trying to protect their lead or were they worn out from the first half?
(They still outplayed Porto in the second half, IMHO, as Porto's only goal came on a rebound kick after a penalty shot allowed mostly because none of the Man U. players came back to help the goalie)
2) Why was the Man U. goal immediately dismissed by the referee after the offsides penalty. Why didn't the refs gather together and discuss the situation to make sure the right call was made in such an important game?
(I didn't see that many referees, so maybe the point about them discussing the offsides is moot if there's only one ref watching the action at that end of the field)
3) Where was David Beckham?
Thanks.
---
Chicken Feather Bed Bugs Bunny Hop Sing Out Side Street Walker Texas Ranger Cookie Dough Boy Wonder Years