Okay... I've been trying for a long time to win a CC in order to introduce this theme. (It'll prolly suck anywayz.) But, here it is: In one panel, you must introduce a scenario, it can be anything whether it's a new law, someone elected to office, new sources of energy, ANYTHING! Then, talk about the upside in one panel, and then talk about the downside in another. You can do this in any particular order. Confusing? Here's an example:
|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| ...and next year, the NBA is also going to tighten the salary cap, and raise the luxury tax for mid-level exceptions. | |
 | |  |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| The upside of this is that smaller market teams like Memphis and Sacramento will be able to compete with the "big boys". | |
 | |  |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 | |  |
| The downside is the Lakers are still going to suck like South Central crackwhores! | |
 | |  |
|
 |
 | |  |
| That's interesting and all. But it still doesn't explain why you kicked me in my [oomph] NUTS! | |
 | |  |
|
|
|
|
Now for the rules:
1) new entries only
2) references questioning mandingo's manhood earn extra points
3) series okay
4) the more obscure the bettah
Judging in about a week...