*sip*

No sir, I don't like it.

---
Do you want ants? Because that's how you get ants.

I don't even think MikeyG is making a good attempt to argue about the meaning of the word, I think he's making a poor attempt to be obligatorily inflammatory.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Do you even have any idea what you are saying? Maybe you can argue that you AREN'T invalid as a human. Maybe you can say you AREN'T morally corrupt. But you can't argue the usage of the word. No, you're grasping at straws because I've hit a nerve. You refuse to believe that maybe you ARE spiritually devoid and perhaps a reprehensible human being. Buh bye, mAAk. Have a happy, happy holiday.

---
The giant three-phallused phallus of Uzbekistan will one day squirt the cosmic jizz of revenge all over Canada.

Yes you've hit a nerve. I've always been afraid someone would suggest my humanity isn't valid.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Dick Cheney may be indicted on charges of bribery, money-laundering and misuse of corporate assets.

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

Yeah, from France. Didn't they funnel money to Saddam Hussein?

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Pretty much everyone did that.

Oh yeah Germany and Russia did too.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

....

And Rummy.

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

Not after the sanctions following the first war though.

I'd better watch my mouth or the French government might sue me too.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

quote:

---

Not after the sanctions following the first war though.

I'd better watch my mouth or the French government might sue me too.

---

That sounds like french reasoning. Or is that Clinton defining? Bush - Clinton - the french... It seems you can't tell the a-holes without a score card.

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

French reasoning because after the first war it was illegal to give money to the Hussein regime because of the sanctions? I think that is pretty cut and dry.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Official: Country Music is Anti-War

---
Please replace the handset, and try again.

But it has always been immoral to work with Sadam. Illegal is a sick bird. Moral decency is what counts. And you van tell 'em Spankling said so - the poster child for moral fortitude.

---
"Jelly-belly gigglin, dancin and a-wigglin, honey that's the way I am!" Janice the Muppet

Well then we wizened up and they didn't.

It's still a "different bird" after you've incurred the wrath of perhaps the most globally comprehensive coalition the world has ever seen for invading one of your neighbors.

Also we supported a draw in the Iran-Iraq War, not Saddam, if that's what you are referring to.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

"The U.S. was officially neutral regarding the Iran-Iraq war, and claimed that it armed neither side."

Shaking Hands: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein greets Donald Rumsfeld, then special envoy of President Ronald Reagan, in Baghdad on December 20, 1983.

---
Think classy, you'll be classy.

I didn't say we didn't arm anybody, I said our policy (like the Soviets') was for a draw to avoid an Arab super-state monopolising oil reserves in the region.

Oh man, that picture, I forgot. It proves I'm wrong somehow about current and past events.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Yeah, that was the "on the record" policy. But if you read the article, it's pretty clear that we supported Saddam. I am going to really go out on a limb here and assume you didn't read the article, or just skimmed it.

Hey Makk, could you please pull your head out of your ass for a minute and explain how we could supply arms to Saddam yet not support him in the Iran-Iraq affair?

Or are you going to just talk in circles like you always do?

---
Think classy, you'll be classy.

I have several questions.

#1) How was Saddam a threat to the United States if there was no WMD and there was no provocation?

#2) How could this be called a humanitarian effort when Saddam, as evil as he is, was allowed to commit genocide during our support, and since he has become less homicidal (although still evil), we want him out?

#3) While Saddam Hussein has posed a threat to the world and to his own people, his campaign against the Kurds, which began in 1988 and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Kurds in Northern Iraq, is surely just cause to prosecute Saddam for human rights abuses. If the United Nations Security Council were to establish an International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq (which has been done successfully in the past), Saddam could be brought to justice without war. Instead of lobbying countries like China, France, and Russia, who have strong economic ties to Iraq, to aid in the forming of such a tribunal, we presented 'evidence' as to the reasons for our planned invasion. Why?

---
I like cheese and panties. Together. Cheese wearing panties.

By also giving support to Iran.

And we could support him as a leader of a nation, without supporting him conquering a neighboring country.

My point was about supporting Saddam after the Persian Gulf War so I don't understand what you are all itchy about Owl.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Isn't supplying arms and supporting two opposing sides in a war pretty fucked up? It's like going to your friend Bob and saying, "Hey, Bob! Dave said you shove frozen weasels up your ass!'. Then you run to Dave and say, "Hey, Dave, Bob said you took to the cock the way white people took to Friends!"

---
The giant three-phallused phallus of Uzbekistan will one day squirt the cosmic jizz of revenge all over Canada.

Yes I think that's where most of the ill-will towards us from Iran stems from.

---
Vote Jeb Bush 2008

Yeah, supporting both sides does nothing but escalate the war. You really have to grasp at straws to defend a policy like that.

MaKK, since Iran hasn't invaded any of its neighbours, would you consider it okay to supply arms to them nowadays?