[Click to view comic: 'A Politician I'd Vote For']
I recently made this political comic strip and it made it to the top of the Top Rated page for a couple of days, with a score of a perfect 10. Now it's a bit lower on the rankings, with a score of 9. That's still a quite respectable score, but it got me thinking.
This comic had a score of 10 with 9 votes, and now has a score of 9 with 10 votes, which means that - if I did my math right (and I'm pretty sure I did) - the last person to rate it rated it as "bad." (The total score would be 90 each way - avg. score of 10 x 9 votes = 90; avg. score of 9 x 10 votes = 90 - so the last vote must have counted as 0, or "bad").
I don't mind that someone didn't like my strip, but I really wish they had left a comment. A reasoned argument against its politics or constructive criticism about my writing style would have been best, but I even would have been happy with something like "U $uXx0rz"; at least that would have let me know that the rater was an immature jackass whose opinion I don't care about anyway. Or if it was someone just trying to knock me out of the top spot, they could have said something like "Ha, ha, now I'm #1" and I would have understood. I wouldn't have liked it, but I would have understood. (Note: I am NOT suggesting that whoever the current top-spot holder is did this. I'm pretty sure it was because the person disagreed with the politics of the strip; I'm just including some alternate reasons that someone could have for rating a comic as "bad.")
Rating a comic as "bad" without leaving a comment seems cowardly and disrespectful to me. You should give creators constructive criticism in order to help them improve their work and give them a chance to respond to that criticism. If you rate one of my comics as "bad," I'd really like to know your reasons for doing so. Most likely, in this case, the rater disagrees with the political statements that the strip is making. To that person I say this (warning: rant ahead): I truly, genuinely want to understand what you're thinking. Do you really disagree that the Bush Administration is eager to engage in war (Iraq, Afghanistan, talk of invading Iran), keep the citizens of the U.S. afraid (terror alert levels), and make their own religious beliefs law (proposed amendment banning gay marriage)? If so, I'd really like to hear what you have to say to defend your views and your support of an administration that seems to be doing all it can to harm this country by taking freedoms and rights away from citizens and non-citizens alike (Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, no right of habeas corpus for detainees), committing war crimes (illegal invasion of Iraq, torture of detainees, refusal to acknowledge provisions of the Geneva Conventions), and divide its citizens.
I'm not trying to start a fight (though I'm aware that this discussion could go in that direction, which is why I posted this in "Fights Go Here"); I just sincerely do not understand how anyone can support such an administration. Maybe they're doing some good that I'm just not seeing, but all I see is an administration that seems to have as little regard for human life, civil liberties, and international law as any terrorist group. And, unlike al-Qaeda, the Bush administration has the world's strongest army and biggest supply of nuclear weapons at its disposal to help achieve its goals. Frankly, that scares the shit out of me.
---
"Laughter is the language of the soul." - Pablo Neruda, as quoted by Lisa Simpson